The Politics of Perception

A Critical Examination of Passing Across Identity Boundaries ✨

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive sociological examination of “passing,” the phenomenon whereby an individual belonging to a stigmatized social group is perceived and accepted as a member of a dominant group. While the act of passing is often a rational and necessary strategy for survival—a means to access safety, social acceptance, and economic opportunity in the face of systemic discrimination—this analysis argues that the imperative to pass is a direct and damaging consequence of oppressive social hierarchies. The pressure to conform to dominant norms, whether they be related to race, gender, ability, sexuality, or class, ultimately reinforces the very structures of inequality that create the need for passing in the first place. This reinforcement comes at a profound psychological cost to the individual, often demanding the severance of community ties, the denial of personal history, and the internalization of shame. Furthermore, the logic of passing systematically erases the legitimacy of identities that do not or cannot conform to dominant categories, a problem felt with particular acuity by non-binary transgender individuals.

The analysis begins by establishing the historical architecture of passing through an in-depth exploration of racial passing in the United States. Grounded in the work of historians like Allyson Hobbs, this section frames passing not as an act of deception, but as a “chosen exile”—a painful response to a violent racial caste system. It traces the motivations for passing from a means of escaping chattel slavery to a strategy for defying Jim Crow-era segregation, highlighting the immense personal loss that accompanied the material gains.

Building on this historical foundation, the report introduces sociological frameworks from scholars such as Erving Goffman to theorize passing as a universal strategy for managing stigma. It deconstructs identity as a social performance, demonstrating that the “passer” engages in a high-stakes version of the identity work that all individuals undertake, with their success or failure predicated entirely on the perception of a social audience.

The central focus then shifts to the contemporary transgender experience, where the concept of passing is fraught with a powerful duality. On one hand, the ability to be perceived as cisgender is a vital survival mechanism in a transphobic world, demonstrably linked to improved mental health outcomes and reduced exposure to violence. On the other hand, the pressure to achieve a “cisgender aesthetic” is a manifestation of internalized transphobia, a capitulation to a rigid and exclusionary gender binary. This critique is sharpened through an analysis of the non-binary dilemma, where the binary logic of passing offers no legible identity to pass into, resulting in erasure and misgendering. The report argues that the pressure for trans people to pass is an extreme intensification of the gender policing that constrains cisgender people as well, revealing a shared interest in dismantling narrow gender norms.

To contextualize this phenomenon, the report undertakes a comparative analysis, examining the analogous dynamics of passing in the realms of disability, sexuality, and social class. This reveals a consistent pattern: across all domains, passing involves the performance of dominant cultural codes to avoid stigma and access privilege, but it invariably incurs psychological costs and reinforces the legitimacy of the oppressive system.

Finally, the report explores liberatory alternatives that challenge the assimilationist imperative of passing. Concepts such as “radical visibility”—an unapologetic refusal to assimilate—and “gender euphoria”—the profound joy of authentic gender expression—are presented as political and personal strategies for reorienting the locus of identity. Instead of seeking validation from an external, normative gaze, these alternatives prioritize internal feelings of authenticity and collective empowerment. The report concludes that while passing remains a crucial tool for navigating hostile worlds, the ultimate goal of any liberatory movement must be to create a society where it is no longer necessary—a society where identity is a matter of self-determination, not social perception.

1. A Chosen Exile: The Historical Architecture of Passing in America

To comprehend the complex dynamics of passing in any contemporary context, particularly concerning gender identity, one must first excavate its deep and painful history within the racial caste system of the United States. The phenomenon of racial passing was not a simple act of disguise or a mere footnote in American history; it was a profound and often traumatic response to a society built upon a foundation of rigid, violent, and fundamentally arbitrary racial distinctions. Quantitative historical analysis suggests this was a widespread phenomenon, with studies of U.S. Census data from 1880-1940 indicating that over 19% of Black males “passed” for white at some point in their lives. 1 This was not an isolated choice but a significant social migration. Understanding this history is crucial because it reveals that passing is not an act of deception perpetrated against an innocent society, but rather a strategic response to a society that is itself constructed upon the lie of inherent racial difference and hierarchy. The person who passes, therefore, does not merely conceal an identity; they expose the fragility and artificiality of the very categories the dominant culture seeks to enforce. 2

1.1. The Origins of Passing in a Racialized Society

The practice of racial passing in America is inextricably linked to the legal and social construction of race itself. Its origins lie in the brutal realities of chattel slavery and the systematic sexual violence perpetrated by white enslavers against enslaved Black women. This violence produced generations of mixed-race children who, despite often having a majority of European ancestry, were legally defined as Black under the principle of hypodescent, colloquially known as the “one-drop rule”. 3 This legal fiction was a brutally efficient tool of social control, designed to maintain the so-called “purity” of the white race and, critically, to expand the population of enslaved people, as the status of the child followed that of the mother. 4 Paradoxically, this rigid and unforgiving system of racial classification created the very conditions that made passing both possible and, for many, a necessity. It produced a population of “racially ambiguous individuals” who could, by appearance, plausibly exist on either side of the color line. 6

The determination of race was not solely a matter of phenotype. As historian Ariela Gross’s work on antebellum court cases demonstrates, race was also a performance. 6 In legal disputes over an individual’s status—bond or free, white or person of color—juries and witnesses policed racial boundaries by evaluating behavior. Demonstrating traits and enjoying rights commonly associated with whiteness—such as being literate, articulate, well-dressed, or even voting—could influence a jury’s decision to assign an individual the legal status of “white”. 6 This performative aspect of race is fundamental to understanding passing. It was not enough to simply look white; one had to act white, to successfully perform the social codes of the dominant group. This reveals an early and powerful precedent for the idea that acceptance into a dominant group is contingent on conforming to its specific cultural and behavioral norms, a dynamic that echoes powerfully in the contemporary transgender experience. The system was designed to be inescapable, yet its internal contradictions created fissures through which individuals could navigate, albeit at great personal risk and cost.

1.2. Motivations: From Survival to Opportunity

The motivations for racial passing evolved in direct response to the changing forms of racial oppression in America. This evolution demonstrates a critical principle: the function of passing is context-dependent, shifting to counteract the specific threats and deprivations enacted by the dominant culture at any given historical moment. Understanding this historical trajectory provides a vital framework for analyzing why passing for marginalized groups today, such as transgender individuals, is so heavily focused on avoiding violence and securing basic social acceptance.

During the antebellum period, the motivation was singular and absolute: survival. To pass as white was to pass as free. 3 For an enslaved person with light skin, passing was a temporary disguise, a tool used to escape the physical and psychological brutality of bondage. 3 The goal was not to become white, but to become free, with many who successfully escaped intending to return to a Black identity once their safety was secured. 3 In this context, passing was an act of profound resistance, a direct flight from a system of violent dehumanization.

Following the Civil War and the abolition of slavery, the significance of passing underwent a dramatic transformation. With emancipation, the act was no longer a prerequisite for freedom, and within many parts of the Black community, it came to be viewed with suspicion and condemnation—as a form of betrayal, a “selling of one’s birthright”. 7 However, the optimistic period of Reconstruction, which offered the promise of a more fluid and integrated society, proved tragically short-lived. 6 The rise of Jim Crow laws, enforced by systemic discrimination and the constant threat of racial terror, reimposed a rigid racial hierarchy. In this new landscape of oppression, passing once again became a critical strategy, but its purpose shifted from securing existential freedom to accessing social and economic opportunity. 6

Under Jim Crow, passing became a way to defy a system designed to relegate Black Americans to a permanent underclass. Individuals passed to gain access to better employment, higher education, safer housing, and the simple dignities of public life that were denied to them based on their race. 6 This era saw the rise of different forms of passing. Some chose to pass permanently, severing all ties with their past and relocating to anonymous urban centers where their history was unknown. 1 Others engaged in what was known as “nine to five passing,” living as Black people in their homes and communities but passing as white in the workplace to secure better jobs and wages. 5 This form of passing, while offering economic benefits, came with its own set of dangers and psychological burdens, requiring individuals to live a precarious double life, constantly managing information and fearing exposure. 5 Economic analyses of this period provide strong evidence for these motivations, showing that passing was positively associated with better political and economic opportunities for whites relative to Blacks. 1 The decision to pass was an active, intentional choice, a response to severe discrimination that required a complete change in lifestyle and situation to be accepted as white by a hostile society. 10

1.3. The Cost of Passing: A “Chosen Exile”

While passing offered a pathway to tangible benefits—freedom, safety, opportunity—it was a transaction that exacted a devastating psychological and social price. Historian Allyson Hobbs has powerfully conceptualized this experience as a “chosen exile,” a term that captures the profound sense of loss and alienation inherent in the act. 2 To pass was to embark on a journey of separation, leaving behind not just a racial identity, but family, friends, community, and the entire cultural and historical context that gave one’s life meaning. 7

Hobbs’s work shifts the scholarly focus from the gains of passing to its immense and often overlooked costs. She argues that the grief, loneliness, and isolation that accompanied this “chosen exile” frequently outweighed the material rewards. 7 The person who passed lived under the constant strain of potential discovery, a fear that could poison relationships and create a pervasive sense of inauthenticity. They might have to ignore relatives or friends in public to protect their new identity, a painful act of denial that underscored their separation. 6 This was not merely an individual loss but a collective one. The Black community lost the talents and contributions of those who crossed the color line, and the act of passing itself could be seen as a painful affirmation of the dominant society’s racist values.

The trope of the “tragic mulatta” in American literature, a figure whose life is destroyed by their inability to belong fully to either the Black or white world, reflects this deep-seated cultural understanding of the pain of racial indeterminacy. 3 The stories of real individuals, such as Anita Hemmings, the first Black graduate of Vassar College who passed as white, illustrate that passing was often a generational commitment, requiring one to raise children in a white identity, perpetuating the exile and the loss of heritage. 11

By the dawn of the Civil Rights era in the mid-twentieth century, a cultural shift began to occur. As the Black Pride movement gained momentum, the psychological burden of passing became increasingly untenable for many racially mixed Americans. The profound loss of kin and community was felt to be too high a price to pay for the benefits of whiteness. 7 This led to a counter-movement, a phenomenon of “passing out”—the conscious and public act of rejecting a white identity to embrace and reclaim one’s Black heritage. 7 This reclamation was a powerful political and personal statement, a rejection of the terms of acceptance dictated by a racist society and an affirmation of the value of Black identity and community. The history of racial passing, with its complex interplay of gain and loss, strategy and pain, provides an indispensable foundation for understanding the high stakes involved in any act of passing, revealing it as a deeply human response to an inhuman social order.

2. The Performance of Identity: Sociological Frameworks of Passing and Stigma

To move from the specific historical example of racial passing to a broader analysis applicable across various social identities, it is essential to employ a set of theoretical tools from the field of sociology. The work of sociologist Erving Goffman, in particular, provides a powerful framework for understanding passing not as an anomaly, but as a fundamental strategy for managing a stigmatized identity within a normative society. By conceptualizing identity as a social performance, this perspective deconstructs the notion of authenticity and shifts the analytical focus from the morality of the individual “passer” to the power dynamics of the social context that makes passing necessary. This theoretical lens validates the lived experience that one’s identity is often predicated on the perception of others, revealing this not as a personal feeling but as a core mechanic of social life.

2.1. Erving Goffman and the Management of Stigma

Erving Goffman’s seminal 1963 work, Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, offers the foundational vocabulary for a sociological analysis of passing. Goffman defined stigma as an attribute that is deeply discrediting, reducing a person in the minds of others from a “whole and usual person to a tainted, discounted one”. 13 Critically, for Goffman, stigma is not inherent in the attribute itself but exists in the relationship between the attribute and the audience’s stereotypes. 13 It is a social construct, a discrepancy between what he termed an individual’s “virtual social identity” (the character we impute to them based on social expectations) and their “actual social identity” (the attributes they can be proven to possess). 13

Within this framework, Goffman introduced a crucial distinction between two types of stigmatized individuals. The “discredited” are those whose stigma is immediately visible or known, forcing them to manage the tension of social interactions. The “discreditable,” by contrast, are those whose stigma is not immediately apparent; their primary challenge is not managing tension but managing information. 13 Passing, in Goffman’s terms, is the principal strategy of the discreditable. It is, fundamentally, “the management of undisclosed discrediting information about the self”. 13

This framework is essential for understanding why passing is a viable, albeit fraught, option for some members of a marginalized group but not for others. A light-skinned Black person, a transgender person who has undergone medical transition, or a person with an invisible disability may be “discreditable” and thus have the option to pass. A dark-skinned Black person, a visibly gender-nonconforming person, or a wheelchair user is “discredited,” and their social strategy must focus on managing tension rather than concealing information. The act of passing, therefore, is an attempt to control information to prevent one’s actual social identity from “spoiling” their virtual social identity, thereby avoiding being cut off from society and becoming a “discredited person facing an unaccepting world”. 13 This act of concealment, while a rational response to stigma, carries a profound paradox: in attempting to navigate an oppressive system by its own rules, the passer implicitly validates the system’s power to define their attribute as discrediting in the first place. It is a form of individual resistance that simultaneously leaves the larger structure of social hierarchy and its value judgments unchallenged.

2.2. Identity as a Social Performance

Building on Goffman’s work, a sociological perspective views identity not as a fixed, internal essence but as a dynamic social process. Identity is a “routine, methodical, and recurring accomplishment” that is achieved through interaction with others. 14 In this sense, all individuals are, to some extent, “performing” their identities for a social audience. We use clothing, mannerisms, language, and other cultural cues to present a version of ourselves that we hope will be accepted and validated by those around us. 13 This concept aligns with Judith Butler’s later theories of gender performativity, which argue that gender is not something one is but something one does, an ongoing series of acts that construct the illusion of a stable, internal gender core. 15

Passing, from this viewpoint, is an intensified and extraordinarily high-stakes version of this universal social process. It involves the deliberate and conscious performance of behaviors, cultural cues, and social signifiers associated with the dominant group in order to gain acceptance into it. 13 This performance is not merely about appearance; it is a comprehensive project of “information management”. 13 The person passing may need to carefully control details about their personal history, avoid people who knew them before, and adopt what Goffman called “prestige symbols”—markers of the dominant group’s status—to draw attention away from their stigmatized identity. 13

This performance-based understanding of identity provides a powerful tool for deconstructing the moralistic discourse that often surrounds passing, which tends to frame it in terms of authenticity versus deception. If all identities are socially performed, then the identity of a person who is passing is not inherently less “real” or “authentic” than that of a member of the dominant group who is also performing their identity, albeit with less conscious effort. The critical difference lies not in the performance itself, but in the social context: the stakes of the performance and the freedom with which it is enacted. The performance of the dominant group member is accepted as natural, normal, and authentic. The performance of the person passing is precarious, constantly policed, and carries the ever-present risk of being “outed” or “clocked,” which can lead to social rejection, discrimination, and violence. 16 This shifts the analytical focus away from judging the morality of the individual passer and toward a critique of the social power structures that validate certain performances while delegitimizing others.

2.3. The Power of Perception

A crucial corollary of the performance model of identity is that the success or failure of the performance is entirely dependent on the perception of the audience. In the context of passing, an individual’s identity is not a matter of self-declaration; it is a status that is either granted or denied by the social group they wish to enter. 11 One cannot simply decide to pass; one must be accepted as a member of the dominant group. This reality places the individual in a position of profound vulnerability, where their safety, well-being, and social standing are contingent upon the subjective judgments of others.

This directly addresses the core concern that “we are still letting other people’s perceptions predicate our identity.” The sociological framework confirms that this is not merely a feeling but a fundamental mechanic of how stigma and social identity operate. The power to define, categorize, and validate identity rests with the dominant group. The person from a stigmatized group who attempts to pass is, in effect, appealing to that power for acceptance. They are submitting their performance for review by a cisnormative, white, able-bodied gaze, hoping that it will be deemed convincing enough to grant them entry.

This dynamic creates a double bind. To be safe and accepted, one must conform to the expectations of the dominant group. But this very act of conformity cedes the power of identity definition to that group, reinforcing their authority and the legitimacy of their standards. It is a bargain made under duress, a trade of self-determination for social survival. The psychological toll of this bargain—the constant self-monitoring, the fear of missteps, the potential for one’s entire social reality to be shattered by a single act of misperception—is immense. Understanding this power dynamic is essential to developing a nuanced critique of passing, one that acknowledges its strategic necessity while simultaneously exposing the oppressive social conditions that demand it.

3. Crossing the Gender Line: The Duality of Passing in the Transgender Experience

The concept of passing finds one of its most potent and contentious modern expressions within the transgender community. Here, the act of being perceived by others as a cisgender person of one’s affirmed gender is a deeply personal and politically charged issue, embodying a fundamental duality. 14 On one hand, passing can be a vital and life-saving tool for navigating a transphobic society, offering a shield against violence and a key to social and economic opportunities. On the other hand, the intense pressure to conform to a “cisgender aesthetic” can be a source of profound psychological strain, reinforcing the very gender binary that many transgender and especially non-binary individuals seek to challenge. This section will explore this duality, examining passing as both a pragmatic survival strategy and a complex, often laborious, project of self-construction that carries significant personal and political implications.

3.1. Defining Transgender Passing

In the context of gender, passing is the social phenomenon where a transgender person is perceived and accepted as a cisgender member of their gender identity. 17 For example, a transgender man is said to be “passing” if he is seen by others simply as a man, without his transgender history being known or apparent. This is distinct from historical instances of gender crossing, such as women who disguised themselves as men to serve in the military or access higher wages, as modern transgender passing is rooted in an internal sense of gender identity that may or may not align with the sex assigned at birth. 17

The discourse around passing includes a specific lexicon. The opposite of passing is “being clocked,” a term for the moment an individual’s transgender status is identified by an observer, often against their will. 17 Many who successfully pass may choose to live “stealth,” meaning they do not disclose their transgender history in their daily lives, often as a measure for safety and to live without the constant burden of their gender identity being a subject of scrutiny. 17 The concept is fundamentally about the management of perception; it is a social outcome, not an internal state. As trans writer Janet Mock has argued, a trans woman being perceived as a woman is not “passing” as something she is not, but “merely being”. 17 This critique highlights the problematic implication of the term “passing”—that the individual is engaged in some form of deception. Nonetheless, the term remains a common and functional descriptor for the experience of being read as cisgender.

3.2. Passing as a Survival Strategy: The Case for “Passing Privilege”

For many transgender people, the debate over the political implications of passing is a luxury they cannot afford. In a world rife with transphobia, which manifests as everything from subtle microaggressions to overt violence, the ability to blend in as cisgender is a powerful survival strategy. 17 The personal narrative of writer Juliet Jacques is a stark illustration of this reality. Initially viewing the desire to pass with suspicion as a conformity to an outdated binary, she found that “five minutes of navigating Brighton’s streets en femme made me reconsider: passing was now a matter of necessity, rather than choice.” The immediate experience of public harassment—cries of “Geezer!” and “Tranny!”, sarcastic wolf-whistles, and objects thrown from cars—transformed passing from an abstract political question into an urgent matter of personal safety. 22

This experience is widely echoed and supported by research. The ability to pass as cisgender, often termed “passing privilege,” is directly linked to a reduction in the risk of prejudice, harassment, and physical violence. 17 It grants access to safer experiences in highly policed, gender-segregated spaces like public restrooms, where non-passing individuals are often confronted and harassed. 23 Beyond immediate physical safety, passing can unlock crucial social and economic benefits, including better employment opportunities, improved access to housing, and a lower likelihood of experiencing homelessness. 17

The psychological benefits are also significant. A 2020 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association reframed passing as “Visual Conformity with Affirmed Gender” (VCAG) and found a strong correlation between achieving this conformity and positive mental health outcomes. Transgender adults who felt they were perceived by others in a way that aligned with their gender identity had a demonstrably lower likelihood of depression and anxiety. 26 This suggests that the social affirmation that comes with being seen as one’s “correct” gender is a critical determinant of well-being. Therefore, while the term “passing privilege” is debated, the tangible safety and psychological relief it describes are undeniable realities. It is a “privilege” born not of unearned advantage, but of being granted a conditional reprieve from the pervasive hostility directed at visibly transgender people. However, this framing is a double-edged sword. While it accurately names the very real benefits afforded to those who can blend in, the language of “privilege” can inadvertently normalize violence and discrimination as the default experience for trans people. It risks defining the absence of harm as a special advantage, rather than defining the presence of harm as a fundamental injustice that must be eradicated for all.

3.3. The Mechanics of Passing: Conforming to the Cisgender Aesthetic

The process of achieving a “passable” appearance is not a passive state but an active, ongoing, and often deeply laborious project of self-construction. Because transgender passing is, at its core, a visual phenomenon, it necessitates a focus on attaining what has been termed a “cisgender aesthetic”. 14 This is the process of aligning one’s physical presentation with the culturally dominant signifiers of masculinity or femininity to the point where one is not “clocked” as transgender. The goal is not necessarily to achieve conventional attractiveness, but rather, as sociologist Mary Rogers argued, to exhibit “no physical characteristics visibly jeopardizing her appearance as a ‘normal’ female”. 14 This involves a meticulous management of physical and behavioral gender cues.

For transgender women and other transfeminine individuals, this process can involve a wide range of practices. These include temporary modifications like styling one’s hair in a culturally feminine manner, wearing makeup to soften facial features, and wearing feminine clothing and accessories. 17 It can also involve more permanent or embodied practices, such as the removal of facial hair and the practice of “tucking” to create a flat genital contour. 17 Voice training is also a common and crucial component, as individuals work to raise their fundamental vocal frequency into the typical female range (approximately 165–255 Hz) from the typical male range (approximately 85–155 Hz) to avoid being misgendered based on their voice. 17

For transgender men and other transmasculine individuals, the mechanics of passing involve a corresponding set of practices aimed at achieving a masculine presentation. This frequently includes “binding” the chest to create a flat appearance, “packing” to create the appearance of a penis, adopting shorter hairstyles, and wearing masculine clothing. 17 Masculinizing hormone therapy (testosterone) is a particularly powerful tool in this process, as it can induce significant physical changes, including the lowering of the voice, redistribution of body fat, cessation of menses, and the growth of facial and body hair, which are strong cultural signifiers of masculinity. 17

This extensive and detailed labor of self-construction is a burden largely invisible to and unrequired of cisgender people. It represents a significant and unequal expenditure of time, money, and emotional energy that is demanded of transgender individuals as the price of social acceptance and safety. The fact that this labor is so intensive and multifaceted reframes passing not as a simple matter of appearance, but as a complex and demanding performance. Furthermore, the outcomes of this labor are not guaranteed. The same 2020 study on VCAG found that only 28% of trans women achieved their desired level of visual conformity, compared to 62% of trans men. 26 This disparity points to the gendered nature of this labor and the ways in which societal standards of femininity can be particularly unforgiving and difficult to achieve, placing a disproportionately heavy burden on transfeminine individuals.

4. A Critique of the Cisnormative Gaze: Passing as Internalized Transphobia

While the previous section established the pragmatic, often life-saving, function of passing, this section engages directly with the critical perspective that the imperative to pass is a harmful and politically regressive phenomenon. This critique argues that the pressure to conform to a cisgender aesthetic is a form of internalized transphobia, a capitulation to the oppressive standards of a cisnormative society. This pressure not only imposes significant psychological costs on the individual but also reinforces the very gender binary that marginalizes them. The problem is felt most acutely by non-binary individuals, for whom the binary logic of passing offers no viable path to recognition, but its roots lie in the broader societal policing of gender that affects everyone, cisgender and transgender alike.

4.1. The Non-Binary Dilemma: Passing into Nothing

The entire conceptual framework of passing is built upon a binary understanding of gender. It presupposes two distinct, legible, and socially recognized endpoints—man and woman—into which one can assimilate. 28 This presents an irresolvable dilemma for non-binary individuals, whose identities exist outside of, between, or beyond this binary. As the user query poignantly states, “There are no associated sexual characteristics for me to fit in.” For a non-binary person, there is no socially sanctioned category to “pass” into.

This structural limitation makes the concept of passing not just difficult, but often logically impossible for non-binary people to achieve. 25 The result is a state of perpetual misperception. In a society that defaults to a binary framework, a non-binary person is almost invariably “read” as either a cisgender man or a cisgender woman, depending on their appearance and assigned sex at birth. A 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey found that 58% of non-binary participants were misgendered as women, while 17% were misgendered as men. 25 This experience is not a form of passing; it is a form of erasure. It is an explicit denial of their identity, a frustrating and invalidating process that underscores their social invisibility. 20 While a binary trans person might strive to pass to have their identity affirmed, a non-binary person is often misgendered in a way that negates their identity. This fundamental incommensurability reveals the exclusionary nature of the passing imperative and highlights how it privileges binary transgender experiences while rendering non-binary identities unintelligible.

4.2. The Policing of Gender for All

The intense pressure placed on transgender people to pass is not a phenomenon that exists in isolation. It is, rather, an extreme and intensified manifestation of the “gender policing” that all members of society are subjected to. Gender policing is the social enforcement of normative gender expressions through a system of rewards for conformity and punishments for non-conformity. 24 These punishments can range from subtle disapproval and discouraging comments to overt harassment and brutal violence. 24 This system functions to keep gender roles rigid and aligned with the gender binary, reinforcing interlocking systems of power like cisnormativity, heteronormativity, and hegemonic masculinity. 24

Crucially, this policing is not reserved for transgender people. Research demonstrates that cisgender individuals who are gender-nonconforming—women who appear “masculine,” men who appear “feminine”—also face social sanction, misgendering, and identity denial. 24 This validates the observation that “lots of cis people do not ‘pass’ by the same metrics that are applied to trans people.” The existence of a broad system of gender policing reveals that the pressure to pass is rooted in a societal intolerance for any deviation from narrow, stereotypical gender norms.

However, this shared experience of policing is not an equal one. While a gender-nonconforming cisgender person may have their gender expression policed, their fundamental gender identity is rarely called into question. For transgender people, the stakes are far higher. Adherence to gender stereotypes is often treated as a prerequisite for having their identity recognized as legitimate at all. 31 Society tends to hold trans people to a stricter, more stereotypical standard of gender conformity than it does cis people. 20 A cis woman can wear pants and sneakers without her womanhood being questioned, but a trans woman might feel compelled to perform a more conventional femininity to be “read” correctly and safely. This demonstrates that the policing of cisgender non-conformity is the very engine that drives the pressure for transgender passing. The two phenomena are causally and inextricably linked, as both are harmed by the same underlying system of rigid gender norms. This shared vulnerability provides a powerful foundation for building political alliances aimed at dismantling the gender binary for the liberation of all.

4.3. Passing as an Internalization of Transphobia

From a critical perspective, the desire to pass can be understood as an internalization of society’s transphobic values. Transgender theorists like Kate Bornstein have powerfully argued that passing “becomes the outward manifestation of shame and capitulation. Passing becomes silence. Passing becomes invisibility. Passing becomes lies. Passing becomes self-denial”. 14 From this viewpoint, striving to be indistinguishable from a cisgender person is an act that implicitly accepts the premise that being visibly transgender is shameful, undesirable, or inferior. It is a form of assimilation that reinforces the transphobic idea that the ideal outcome for a trans person is to erase all traces of their transness.

This critique is supported by psychological models of minority stress. The Transgender Identity Survey, a clinical tool used to measure internalized transphobia, conceptualizes “investment in passing as a cisgender person” as one of its four core dimensions, alongside shame, pride (reverse-scored), and alienation from other transgender people. 28 Internalized transphobia is defined as a minority stress process that results from the internalization of negative societal prejudices. 32 This process is strongly correlated with a host of adverse mental health outcomes, including higher rates of depression, anxiety, substance use, and suicidality. 28 When an individual invests heavily in passing as a response to societal stigma, they are, in effect, turning society’s negative gaze inward, which can be psychologically corrosive.

However, it is crucial to approach this critique with nuance. Framing the desire to pass solely as a moral or political failing risks blaming individuals for their rational responses to a dangerous world. It can, as scholar Katrina Roen warns, come “perilously close to accusing passing transsexuals of having false consciousness”. 14 The tension is not between “good” trans people who resist passing and “bad” trans people who assimilate. Rather, the tension exists within a painful double bind created by a hostile society: to ensure one’s physical and psychological safety, one may feel compelled to adopt strategies of concealment and assimilation that simultaneously reinforce the oppressive system and inflict their own form of psychological harm. The problem lies not with the individual’s choice, but with the society that forces such an impossible choice.

4.4. The Psychological and Political Costs

The pressure to pass, whether it is successfully achieved or not, imposes significant costs. Psychologically, the act of concealment required for passing can be a profound source of stress. It can lead to a state of hypervigilance, a constant fear of being discovered, and a preoccupation with managing one’s presentation that is mentally and emotionally exhausting. 5 This experience directly mirrors the “grief, loneliness, and isolation” described by Allyson Hobbs in the context of racial passing, as it often requires a similar denial of one’s history and a separation from communities of shared experience. 7 The need to constantly monitor one’s behavior, voice, and appearance to avoid being “clocked” prevents a sense of ease and authenticity, creating a persistent underlying anxiety.

The political costs are equally significant. A collective focus on individual passing and assimilation can hinder the development of a broader, more radical political movement. Theorists such as Sandy Stone have argued that the true act of liberation is not to pass successfully within the existing gender system, but to reject the imperative to pass altogether. This rejection—the choice to be visibly and unapologetically trans—represents a move toward a “posttranssexual” identity that actively challenges and subverts the gender binary instead of quietly assimilating into it. 14 When the goal is individual invisibility, it becomes more difficult to build the collective visibility needed for political action. Furthermore, the emphasis on passing can create and exacerbate internal community hierarchies, where those who can and do pass are sometimes seen as more “successful” or legitimate, while those who cannot or will not are marginalized, a dynamic Janet Mock has strongly critiqued. 20 This prioritization of individual assimilation over collective liberation can ultimately stifle the potential for radical social change.

5. Echoes and Analogues: Passing Across Social Boundaries

The phenomenon of passing is not unique to the domains of race and gender. It is a recurring social strategy that emerges wherever a society creates a hierarchy of identity, stigmatizing certain groups while privileging a dominant “norm.” By expanding the analysis to include the contexts of disability, sexuality, and social class, as requested, we can identify a consistent underlying logic. In each case, passing involves the concealment of a marginalized identity and the performance of dominant cultural codes to avoid stigma and access the benefits of membership in the privileged group. This comparative approach illuminates the universal mechanics of stigma and power while also highlighting the unique features and consequences of passing within each specific social domain.

5.1. Disability Passing: Concealing Impairment

In the context of disability studies, passing refers to the act of concealing a known physical, sensory, cognitive, or psychological impairment in order to appear “normal,” “able-bodied,” or neurotypical. 37 This is a pervasive phenomenon, driven by the powerful social stigma attached to disability. The primary motivation for disability passing is to avoid the prejudice, shame, social exclusion, and discrimination that people with disabilities often face, and to gain access to social and economic opportunities—from employment to simple social acceptance—that might otherwise be denied. 37

Like other forms of passing, this concealment comes at a significant cost. It is an active, effortful process of denying a fundamental part of one’s identity, which can exact a heavy psychological and even physical toll. 37 The anthology Disability and Passing: Blurring the Lines of Identity, edited by Jeffrey A. Brune and Daniel J. Wilson, provides a rich historical exploration of this tension. The essays in the collection examine a wide range of experiences, from enslaved people in the antebellum South who feigned disability as a form of resistance against their enslavers, to polio survivors in the mid-20th century who, inspired by the public image of Franklin D. Roosevelt, endured great pain to pass as able-bodied to avoid institutionalization. 41 The book also explores the experiences of individuals with invisible disabilities, such as mental illness, for whom passing can be a daily performance to avoid social ostracism—a way to “get people to sit next to you on the bus”. 41

The parallel to transgender passing is striking. In both cases, individuals are often pressured to conceal their medical histories and bodily realities to be perceived as “normal.” The person with an invisible disability who hides their condition to secure a job is engaging in a similar strategy of information management as the trans person living “stealth.” Both acts are responses to a society that stigmatizes bodies and minds that deviate from a narrow, prescribed norm. Furthermore, the decision to pass or not is complex and situational, with both choices carrying their own set of benefits and burdens.

5.2. Sexuality Passing: The Myth of “Straight-Passing Privilege”

The concept of passing also manifests in the context of sexuality, though its dynamics are unique and often misunderstood. The most prominent contemporary debate revolves around the notion of “straight-passing privilege,” an idea most frequently and harmfully applied to bisexual and other plurisexual (bi+) individuals—that is, those with the capacity for attraction to more than one gender. 44 The accusation suggests that a bi+ person in a relationship with someone of a different gender can “pass” as heterosexual, thereby avoiding the homophobia faced by gay and lesbian individuals and enjoying the privileges of heteronormativity. 44

However, a growing body of scholarship forcefully deconstructs this idea as a harmful myth. This critique argues that what is perceived as “passing” is, in fact, a form of erasure and invisibility. 44 This erasure stems from a society structured around both heteronormativity (the assumption that everyone is straight) and mononormativity (the assumption that individuals are attracted to only one gender). Within this binary framework of gay or straight, bisexuality is often rendered unintelligible, seen as a temporary phase, a form of confusion, or an inauthentic identity. 44 Consequently, when a bi+ person is not “out,” it is often not an act of privileged concealment but a rational response to pervasive biphobia, which they experience from both heterosexual and gay/lesbian communities. 44 Their “passing” is a misrecognition, a failure of the social audience to comprehend their identity, rather than a successful performance for personal gain.

This dynamic resonates powerfully with the non-binary transgender experience. Just as bi+ identity is erased by a binary (gay/straight) understanding of sexuality, non-binary identity is erased by a binary (man/woman) understanding of gender. In both cases, the individual’s identity does not fit into the socially legible categories, and what might look like “passing” from the outside is experienced as invalidating misperception from the inside. The “privilege” is illusory; the reality is one of being ontologically incomprehensible within dominant social frameworks. 45

5.3. Class Passing: Performing Cultural Capital

While less frequently discussed under the specific term “passing,” the performance of social class is a significant and related phenomenon in societies with high levels of inequality, such as the United States. While broad “social mobility” refers to the actual movement between classes over time, “class passing” refers more specifically to the active performance of belonging to a social class other than one’s own, typically a higher one. 13

The mechanics of class passing are subtle and deeply cultural. They involve the successful deployment of what sociologist Pierre Bourdieu termed “cultural capital”—the non-financial social assets that promote social mobility beyond economic means. This includes mastering the nuances of accent, vocabulary, and grammar of the dominant class, a process often referred to as “code-switching”. 49 It also involves adopting the correct aesthetic signifiers in dress, manners, and etiquette (e.g., knowing how to hold a fork correctly at a formal dinner), and displaying familiarity with the cultural touchstones of the elite, such as art, literature, travel, and leisure activities. 48 The motivation is clear: to gain access to the powerful social and professional networks that facilitate upward mobility and are often closed to outsiders. 12

A related and particularly charged manifestation of this dynamic is the accusation of “acting white” leveled at some members of racial minority groups, particularly Black Americans, who achieve academic or professional success. 53 In this context, the adoption of behaviors and cultural preferences associated with the white middle or upper class (such as speaking Standard American English or excelling in school) is sometimes perceived by peers as a betrayal of one’s own culture and an attempt to assimilate into the dominant group. 55 This highlights the immense pressure faced by individuals navigating the intersection of race and class, caught between the demands of assimilation required for upward mobility and the expectations of cultural loyalty from their community of origin. The need to learn and meticulously perform a new set of cultural codes to be accepted in a higher social class is directly analogous to the way transgender individuals must often learn and perform hyper-conventional gendered cues to pass. Both processes involve a conscious, stressful, and continuous monitoring of self-presentation to gain acceptance in a new social world.

5.4. A Comparative Analysis of Passing Across Social Domains

The following table synthesizes the core dynamics of passing across the discussed social domains, highlighting the consistent underlying structure of navigating stigma in a hierarchical society.

This systematic comparison reveals that while the specific content of the performance changes from one domain to the next, the underlying logic of navigating stigma through assimilation remains remarkably consistent. It is a testament to the pervasive power of social hierarchies to shape individual lives and force agonizing choices between authenticity and survival.

6. Beyond Passing: Toward Radical Visibility and Gender Euphoria

The preceding analysis has established that the imperative to pass, while often a necessary survival strategy, is a deeply problematic phenomenon rooted in oppressive social hierarchies. It demands assimilation into a dominant norm, imposes significant psychological costs, and erases the validity of non-conforming identities. The crucial question, then, is what lies beyond this paradigm. If the goal is not simply to survive within an unjust system but to transform it, what are the alternatives? This final section explores two powerful, interconnected concepts that have emerged from queer and transgender communities as pathways toward a more liberated existence: radical visibility and gender euphoria. These concepts offer a fundamental reorientation, shifting the focus from assimilation and external perception to unapologetic presence, self-determination, and internal joy.

6.1. Radical Visibility: The Politics of Unapologetic Presence

As a direct counter-strategy to the silence, concealment, and invisibility inherent in passing, “radical visibility” proposes a politics of unapologetic presence. It is a concept most powerfully articulated by queer, disabled, Filipinx artist and activist Sky Cubacub, creator of the clothing line Rebirth Garments. Radical visibility is defined as an “unapologetic refusal to assimilate, a claim to our bodies, and a celebratory insistence on highlighting the parts of us that society typically shuns”. 57 This is not merely about being “seen,” which can often lead to surveillance and violence, but about seizing control of the terms of one’s own visibility. 58

The strategy works on multiple levels. On a personal level, it is an act of empowerment. By choosing to be visibly and authentically oneself—whether queer, trans, disabled, or a person of color—individuals can reclaim a sense of agency and pride that is often stripped away by societal stigma. 59 Cubacub’s work, which uses bright colors and exuberant designs for all body types, aims to make people feel excited about being themselves and showing off their identities. 59 On a political level, radical visibility is a confrontational act. It challenges the normative gaze by refusing to be invisible or to conform to palatable, assimilationist standards. As activists Ugla Stefanía Jónsdóttir and Fox Fisher argue, living with radical openness and vulnerability can shift abstract, dehumanizing debates about trans people into tangible human connections, forcing society to see trans people as people, not as issues. 62

This approach seeks to dismantle the “new homonormativity” that grants conditional acceptance only to those members of the LGBTQ+ community who conform to dominant, often white, middle-class, and able-bodied norms. 58 Radical visibility, in contrast, embraces intersectionality and celebrates deviance from the norm as a source of political power. 63 It is a call to move beyond a politics of integration into dominant institutions and toward a transformative agenda that challenges the very foundations of those institutions. 63 It is a demanding and often dangerous strategy, one that is not possible or safe for everyone in all situations. However, as a political ideal, it offers a powerful alternative to the logic of passing, envisioning a future where liberation comes not from blending in, but from standing out.

6.2. Gender Euphoria: The Internal Compass of Authenticity

If radical visibility is the outward-facing political strategy, then “gender euphoria” is its internal, affective counterpart. A concept that has emerged organically from within transgender and non-binary communities, gender euphoria is the profound, powerful, and positive emotion that comes from feeling a sense of “rightness” in one’s gender. 64 It is the direct opposite of gender dysphoria. While dysphoria is characterized by the distress, discomfort, and pain of incongruence between one’s internal gender identity and one’s body or social role, euphoria is characterized by joy, elation, confidence, and a feeling of authentic selfhood. 64

Experiences that elicit gender euphoria are deeply personal and varied. They can be social, such as being correctly gendered by a friend or stranger without hesitation. 65 They can be physical, stemming from gender-affirming medical care, or from simpler acts like a new haircut, wearing a chest binder, or finding an article of clothing that perfectly expresses one’s identity. 64 They can also be internal, arising from moments of self-reflection and self-acceptance. 64 For many, these moments are not just pleasant; they are described as “literally life saving,” providing a powerful antidote to the psychological distress of dysphoria and societal transphobia. 64

The concept of gender euphoria offers a revolutionary alternative to the logic of passing. The entire project of passing is oriented around an external gaze; its goal is to achieve validation from the perception of others. Success is measured by the ability to be seen as “normal” or “real” by a cisnormative society. Gender euphoria, in contrast, reorients the locus of validation inward. It prioritizes the individual’s own internal feelings of joy, rightness, and authenticity as the ultimate measure of a successful gender expression. The guiding question shifts from “Am I being perceived correctly by others?” to “Do I feel right, joyful, and authentic in this moment?”. 65

This shift is profoundly liberatory, especially for non-binary individuals. Since there is no cisnormative standard for a non-binary person to pass as, the pursuit of external validation is a futile and frustrating exercise. The pursuit of gender euphoria, however, provides a meaningful and achievable goal. It allows for an infinite variety of gender expressions, validating any presentation that brings the individual a sense of authentic joy, regardless of whether it is legible to the outside world. By centering one’s own euphoria as the guiding principle of transition and expression, individuals can reclaim their identity from the judgment of the social audience and ground it in their own lived, felt experience.

7. Conclusion

7.1. Synthesis: Reclaiming Identity Beyond Perception

This report has traced the complex and often painful contours of “passing” as a social phenomenon, journeying from its historical roots in the “chosen exile” of racial passing in America to its contemporary manifestation as a fraught and dualistic concept within the transgender experience. The analysis validates the foundational critique that the pressure to pass is a harmful and exclusionary consequence of an oppressive social order. It is a demand for assimilation into a dominant norm that is predicated on the stigmatization and erasure of difference. While passing has been, and for many remains, a crucial and rational strategy for survival in a hostile world, the imperative to do so reinforces the very hierarchies—of race, gender, ability, sexuality, and class—that make it necessary.

The sociological frameworks of stigma and performance reveal that passing is a high-stakes negotiation with a social audience that holds the power of perception. It is a performance judged by a normative gaze, where acceptance is conditional and authenticity is precarious. This dynamic is felt with particular intensity by transgender individuals, for whom the ability to be perceived as cisgender can mean the difference between safety and violence, acceptance and rejection. Yet, this pursuit of safety through conformity comes at a profound cost, demanding a laborious and often psychologically taxing performance of a “cisgender aesthetic” that can feel like a capitulation to the very binary that constrains them. For non-binary people, this logic collapses entirely, as the binary framework offers no legible identity to pass into, resulting in a state of perpetual misgendering and social invisibility.

The parallels drawn with disability, sexuality, and class passing demonstrate that this is not an isolated issue but a recurring pattern in societies structured by inequality. In every domain, the marginalized are faced with a similar agonizing choice: to remain authentic and visible at great personal risk, or to attempt to pass into the dominant group at the cost of self-denial and alienation. However, the analysis does not end in this double bind. By exploring the emergent concepts of radical visibility and gender euphoria, this report points toward a more liberatory future. These alternatives represent a fundamental reorientation of power. They shift the locus of identity validation from the external, critical gaze of society to the internal, lived experience of the individual. Radical visibility is a political declaration of presence, a refusal to be silent or invisible. Gender euphoria is a personal and political compass, guiding individuals toward expressions of self that are rooted in joy and authenticity rather than in the pursuit of external approval.

7.2. Strategies for a World Beyond Passing

Moving from a paradigm of passing to one of radical visibility and gender euphoria is not merely an individual journey; it requires collective action and a transformation of social conditions. The path forward involves a multi-pronged approach aimed at both reducing the dangers that make passing a necessity and increasing the opportunities for authentic self-expression.

For Allies: The most critical role for allies is to actively contribute to the safety and validation of transgender and gender-nonconforming people, thereby reducing the pressure to pass. This begins with education—taking the initiative to learn about trans issues rather than placing the burden of education on trans individuals. 66 The most direct and impactful actions are often the simplest: consistently using a person’s correct name and pronouns without making a spectacle of it, and apologizing briefly and moving on if a mistake is made. 66 These small acts of respect can be powerful sources of social gender euphoria and create environments where trans people feel seen and affirmed. 65 Allies can also advocate for trans-inclusive policies in their workplaces, schools, and communities, and challenge transphobic language and behavior when they encounter it. The goal is to create safer spaces where the cost of visibility is lowered.

For Communities: Within the transgender and broader queer communities, the work involves a conscious effort to dismantle the internal hierarchies that privilege passing individuals as more legitimate or valuable. This means actively challenging the imposition of unrealistic, cisnormative beauty standards and celebrating the full diversity of transgender, non-binary, and gender-nonconforming bodies and expressions. 20 As Janet Mock powerfully states, “The work begins by each of us recognizing that cis people are not more valuable or legitimate and that trans people who blend as cis are not more valuable or legitimate”. 20 Building strong, supportive community networks where individuals can be their authentic selves without fear of judgment is a crucial buffer against the minority stress imposed by the outside world. 35

For Society: The ultimate goal must be the dismantlement of the rigid social hierarchies that create the need for passing in the first place. This is a long-term project of radical social transformation. It involves legally and socially challenging the gender binary, for instance, by advocating for the removal of gender markers on official documents, which serve to naturalize and enforce binary categorization. 70 It requires a fierce and organized political opposition to the wave of anti-trans legislation that seeks to deny gender-affirming care and restrict the public existence of trans people. 71 Crucially, it involves building broad coalitions. The recognition that the policing of gender harms gender-nonconforming cisgender people as well as transgender people opens the door for alliances based on a shared interest in dismantling restrictive gender norms. By fighting for a world where all forms of gender expression are valued, we can begin to create the conditions where identity is no longer policed, and passing becomes a relic of a less liberated past.

Works Cited

1. The Fluidity of Race: “Passing” in the United States, 1880-1940 - NBER

2. “Lying about a Lie”: Racial Passing in US History, Literature and Popular Culture | Journal of American Studies - Cambridge Core

3. Passing (racial identity) - Wikipedia

4. What Is the Definition of Passing for White? - ThoughtCo

5. Passing - Sociology of Race - iResearchNet

6. Allyson Hobbs, A Chosen Exile : A History of Racial Passing in American Life - Transatlantica

7. A Chosen Exile: A History of Racial Passing in American Life … - Stanford CCSRE

8. Identity in Passing: RACE-ING and E-RACE-ING in American and African American History - The University of Chicago Press: Journals

9. A Chosen Exile: A History of Racial Passing in American Life - Stanford History

10. Racial Passing in the United States - NBER

11. “Passing” – Queer Cultures 101 - ScholarBlogs Emory

12. Origin of Everything | What is Racial Passing? - PBS

13. Passing (sociology) - Wikipedia

14. (PDF) “Passing” and the Politics of Deception: Transgender Bodies, Cisgender Aesthetics, and the Policing of Inconspicuous Marginal Identities - ResearchGate

15. Non-Conformity as Queerness: The Phenomenology of Gender Identity Beyond the Binary - Digital Commons @ UConn

16. Passing in American Culture - Rollins Scholarship Online

17. Passing (gender) - Wikipedia

18. Reflections on White-Passing Black Identity - University of Central Florida

19. The Language of Transgender History and Visibility - BackStory

20. Passing — TransHub

21. Transphobia - Wikipedia

22. ‘Confidence is the key to passing - or at least to silencing the … - The Guardian

23. Passing: It’s More Complicated Than You Might Think - The SMU Journal

24. Gender policing - Wikipedia

25. Experiences of Transgender Identity in a Sample of Primarily White … - PMC

26. VISUAL CONFORMITY WITH AFFIRMED GENDER OR “PASSING”: ITS DISTRIBUTION AND ASSOCIATION WITH DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY IN A COHORT OF TRANSGENDER PEOPLE - PMC

27. Trans Men: Precarious Manhood and the Paradox of … - PDXScholar

28. The Transgender Identity Survey: A Measure of Internalized Transphobia - ResearchGate

29. Digital Shame, Dehumanization, and Dismissal: An Analysis of Gender Policing - Digital Commons @PVAMU

30. “Suck It Up, Buttercup”: Understanding and Overcoming Gender Disparities in Policing - PMC

31. Gender nonconformity leads to identity denial for cisgender and … - Utrecht University

32. Relationship of Internalized Transnegativity and … - Frontiers

33. The Transgender Identity Survey: A Measure of Internalized Transphobia - PMC

34. The phenomenology of gender dysphoria in adults: A systematic review and meta-synthesis - PMC

35. Stigma, Mental Health, and Resilience in an Online Sample of the … - PMC

36. Full article: The impact of microaggressions on the mental health of trans and gender-diverse people: A scoping review - Taylor & Francis Online

37. Disability and Passing: Blurring the Lines of Identity | Psychiatric Services

38. Reflections and Explorations of Passing | Disability Studies Quarterly

39. Disability and Passing: Blurring the Lines of Identity | Psychiatric Services

40. Disability and passing: Blurring the lines of identity - ResearchGate

41. Project MUSE - Disability and Passing - Johns Hopkins University

42. Disability and Passing: Blurring the Lines of Identity ed. by Jeffrey A. Brune and Daniel J. Wilson - ResearchGate

43. Review of Disability and Passing by eds. Brune & Wilson - CJDS

44. Deconstructing the Clinging Myth of ‘Straight-Passing privilege’for … - Taylor & Francis Online

45. Deconstructing the Clinging Myth of ‘Straight-Passing privilege’ for bi+ People - Taylor & Francis Online

46. Deconstructing the Clinging Myth of ‘Straight-Passing privilege’ for bi+People - University of Bristol Research Portal

47. Social class - Wikipedia

48. ‘Class-passing’: how do you learn the rules of being rich? | US news - The Guardian

49. Ableism, Code-Switching, and Camouflaging: A Letter to the Editor … | ASHA Journals

50. Let’s Talk About Code-Switching: A Double-Edged Sword - Berkeley Graduate Division

51. Ask Alto: What is code-switching? - AltoPartners

52. What Is Code-Switching? - Psychology Today

53. “Black Person Acting White” - ACENet

54. 5 Ways Acting White - AceNet Hub

55. “Acting White” and Oppositional Culture in Education - Oxford Bibliographies

56. Acting white - Wikipedia

57. Radical Visibility: A Queercrip Dress Reform Movement Manifesto zine - Buddy Chicago

58. ‘Access necessitates being seen’: Queer Visibility and Intersectional Embodiment … - Scholar Commons

59. Sky Cubacub Believes In Radical Visibility - Vocalo

60. Dress Reform Movement For All Genders, Sizes, And Abilities. | Sky Cubacub - YouTube

61. Sky Cubacub: Dress Reform Movement For All Genders, Sizes, And Abilities. | TED Talk

62. The Power of Radical Vulnerability | Ugla Stefanía Jónsdóttir & Fox … - YouTube

63. Cathy Cohen, “Punks, Bulldaggers, and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics?” - M4BL

64. “A little shiny gender breakthrough”: Community understandings of gender euphoria - PMC

65. Gender Dysphoria and Euphoria – Victim Service Center of Central Florida

66. Supporting the Transgender People in Your Life: A Guide to Being a Good Ally - NCTE

67. Guide to Being an Ally to Transgender and Nonbinary Young People - The Trevor Project

68. Effects of Cisnormative Beauty Standards on Transgender Women’s Perceptions and Expressions of Beauty | Request PDF - ResearchGate

69. Body Image & Beauty Standards in LGBTQIA2S+ Communities - Autonomy Therapy

70. Feminist views on transgender topics - Wikipedia

71. “They’re Ruining People’s Lives”: Bans on Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender Youth in the US - Human Rights Watch

72. The Anti-Trans Movement Framework - The Commons Social Change Library

73. “They’re Ruining People’s Lives”: Bans on Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender Youth in the US - Human Rights Watch