The Engines of History: A Synthesis of Societal Dynamics

From Cohesion to Collapse ✨

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive synthesis of major contemporary theories explaining long-term societal change, navigating the central intellectual tension between historical particularity and the search for universal patterns. It examines three interconnected layers of inquiry to construct an integrated model of historical dynamics. First, it dissects the competing grand narratives of civilizational development, contrasting Jared Diamond’s environmental determinism with Francis Fukuyama’s institutional path dependency and David Graeber and David Wengrow’s radical critique emphasizing human agency and political choice. Second, it delves into the quantitative models of cliodynamics, pioneered by Jack Goldstone and Peter Turchin, which posit the existence of predictable, demographically-driven cycles of social integration and disintegration, driven by forces such as popular immiseration, elite overproduction, and state fiscal distress.

Finally, the report explores the micro-foundations of human sociality, including the evolutionary basis for large-scale cooperation (ultrasociety), the role of trust and social capital in building cohesive communities, and the psychological architecture of morality that both binds and blinds human groups. By placing these diverse theoretical frameworks in direct conversation—from macro-level geographical constraints to micro-level psychological mechanisms—the analysis concludes that a robust understanding of history requires a multi-scale approach that rejects monocausal explanations. This integrated framework is presented as an essential tool for comprehending the structural pressures, institutional fragilities, and social-psychological dynamics driving contemporary global instability.

1. Introduction: The Search for Patterns in the Human Past

The study of human history is an endeavor marked by a persistent, foundational tension. On one hand, it is a discipline of particulars—a chronicle of unique individuals, contingent events, and culturally specific trajectories. On the other, it is a search for patterns, for the deep, underlying forces that shape the rise and fall of civilizations, the cycles of peace and conflict, and the long-term evolution of social structures. This report undertakes a comprehensive synthesis of the major contemporary theories that seek to resolve this tension by explaining long-term societal change. It navigates the central intellectual questions that animate this field: Why have human societies followed such divergent developmental paths? Are there predictable, recurring cycles of social integration and disintegration? Is it possible to formulate a “science of history” that identifies causal mechanisms, or is the human story one of radical freedom, contingency, and irreducible complexity?

To address these questions, this analysis will proceed by examining three distinct but interconnected layers of inquiry. First, it will dissect the competing grand narratives of civilizational development, focusing on the large-scale structural theories that attribute historical outcomes to geography, institutions, or human agency. Second, it will delve into the quantitative and mathematical models of historical dynamics, primarily the field of cliodynamics, which posits the existence of predictable, demographically driven cycles of stability and collapse. Finally, it will explore the micro-foundations of human sociality—the evolutionary, psychological, and cultural mechanisms such as trust, morality, and language that make large-scale cooperation and conflict possible. By placing these diverse theoretical frameworks into direct conversation, and testing them against specific historical case studies, this report aims to construct a multi-scale, integrated model for understanding the complex engines that drive human history.

2. The Architects of Civilization: Competing Grand Narratives

The quest to understand the vast disparities in power, wealth, and political organization across the globe has given rise to several powerful, and often conflicting, “big picture” theories of history. These grand narratives attempt to identify the primary drivers of civilizational development, offering foundational explanations for why the modern world looks the way it does. This section examines three of the most influential contemporary frameworks, focusing on their core arguments, their reception within the scholarly community, and the deeper implications of their competing claims about the forces that shape human destiny.

2.1. The Geographic Stage: Jared Diamond’s Environmental Determinism

In his Pulitzer Prize-winning work, Guns, Germs, and Steel, biologist Jared Diamond presents a powerful and widely influential thesis of environmental determinism. 1 Framed as an answer to “Yali’s Question”—why Europeans developed so much “cargo” while New Guineans did not—the book argues against racist explanations of history that posit any inherent intellectual or moral superiority among certain peoples. 2 Instead, Diamond contends that the vast differences in societal development across continents are attributable to “ultimate causes” rooted in geography and the environment. 5

The core of Diamond’s argument is that the Eurasian landmass possessed a unique and decisive set of environmental advantages. Its primary east-west axis allowed for the rapid diffusion of domesticated crops, animals, and technologies across similar latitudes and climates, a process far more difficult on the north-south axes of the Americas and Africa. 5 Furthermore, Eurasia was home to a disproportionately high number of wild plant and animal species suitable for domestication. 2 This head start in food production led to a cascade of consequences: higher population densities, sedentary societies, and food surpluses that could support non-farming specialists such as soldiers, bureaucrats, inventors, and scribes. 2 These dense populations, living in close proximity to domesticated animals, also developed immunities to a host of epidemic diseases—the “germs”—that would later prove devastating to populations without such exposure. 5 The technological specialization and centralized political structures (“guns” and “steel”) that arose from this agricultural foundation were therefore not the product of superior ingenuity, but of environmental opportunity. 2 In this view, European conquest was the proximate result of these advantages, but the ultimate cause was the geographical luck of the draw 13,000 years ago. 10

While Guns, Germs, and Steel achieved immense popular success for its accessible narrative and its powerful rebuttal to racist historiography, its reception among academic historians and anthropologists has been far more critical. 2 The most significant criticism is that Diamond’s model is overly deterministic, effectively erasing human agency, culture, and political choice from the historical equation. 5 Critics argue that by attributing the rise of the West to deep-seated environmental factors, the book renders colonialism an “accidental” and unavoidable outcome of geography rather than the result of specific, deliberate political and economic decisions. 14 This approach, it is argued, downplays the complex roles of institutions, ideology, and individual and collective action in shaping historical events. 7 Furthermore, specialists have pointed to numerous factual and interpretive errors in Diamond’s work, particularly in his account of the Spanish conquest of the Inca at Cajamarca and his understanding of the origins of epidemic diseases. 12 Some scholars contend that while Diamond explicitly rejects biological racism, his argument creates a new form of environmental determinism that still serves to justify existing global inequalities as the inevitable result of impersonal, long-term forces. 14

The intense scholarly debate surrounding Guns, Germs, and Steel transcends mere factual disputes, revealing a fundamental schism in the study of history: the persistent tension between structural forces and human agency. Diamond’s model presents a powerful structural argument where environmental “ultimate causes” set societies on near-immutable long-term trajectories. This framework implies a human nature that is primarily reactive, responding to the opportunities and constraints presented by the physical environment. In contrast, the critiques leveled against his work implicitly champion a more agentic view of history. By emphasizing the importance of culture, institutions, and political decisions, critics posit a human nature that is more creative, autonomous, and capable of shaping its own destiny, even within environmental limits. This foundational disagreement over the relative power of structure versus agency demonstrates that any grand narrative of history is also, implicitly, a theory of human nature, setting the stage for the contrasting institutional and cultural arguments that follow.

2.2. The Institutional Blueprint: Francis Fukuyama’s Political Order

In his two-volume work, The Origins of Political Order and Political Order and Political Decay, political scientist Francis Fukuyama offers an alternative grand narrative, one centered not on geography but on the development of political institutions. Fukuyama argues that a stable, modern liberal democracy rests on a tripod of three key components: a strong, centralized, and impersonal state; the rule of law that binds even the rulers; and a government that is accountable to its people. 17 His central project is to explain, through a sweeping comparative history, why these three institutions emerged in different sequences and to varying degrees across major world civilizations.

Fukuyama’s analysis reveals distinct developmental pathways. China, he argues, developed the first truly modern state under the Qin Dynasty, characterized by a meritocratic bureaucracy, but it never developed a robust rule of law or political accountability to constrain the power of the emperor. 18 India, by contrast, developed a powerful rule of law early in its history through the religious authority of the Brahmin priestly caste, which constrained state power but also prevented the formation of a strong, unified state for much of its history. 18 The Islamic world, particularly the Ottoman Empire, innovated by creating a military and administrative class of slave-soldiers (Mamluks and Janissaries) loyal only to the state, thus breaking the power of tribal kinship groups that often undermined central authority. 18 Europe’s trajectory was unique. The long-standing conflict between church and state, epitomized by the Investiture Controversy, prevented either from achieving absolute dominance. 18 This created a space for the development of both an independent legal tradition (the rule of law) and, eventually, in places like England, a system of political accountability where the state was balanced by a strong civil society. 18

Integral to Fukuyama’s institutional framework is his earlier work, Trust, which provides the cultural micro-foundations for his model. 21 He argues that economic prosperity is not merely the result of rational self-interest, but depends heavily on a society’s stock of “social capital”—the shared norms, values, and trust that enable people to cooperate. 22 He distinguishes between high-trust societies, like Japan and Germany, which possess a wide “radius of trust” that allows for the spontaneous creation of large, complex, non-kin-based corporations, and low-trust societies, like Southern Italy and China, where trust is largely confined to the family. 21 In these “familistic” societies, large-scale enterprises can typically only be created through state intervention, as civil society lacks the requisite social capital. 21

Fukuyama’s work has been praised for its ambition and erudition, but it has also faced criticism for what some see as a teleological narrative that culminates in a specific model of Western liberal democracy, echoing his controversial “End of History” thesis. 26 Critics have pointed out that his neat categorization of societies can seem overly rigid and that his reliance on contingent historical events—such as the specific outcomes of power struggles in early modern Europe—undermines the predictive power of his general theory. 26

However, Fukuyama’s most profound contribution is not just the identification of the three key institutions, but the argument that the sequence in which they develop creates deep and durable path dependencies. The fact that China developed a powerful state long before it developed a rule of law or accountability has created a historical pattern of centralized, authoritarian power that persists to this day. Conversely, Europe’s long history of balancing state power against the power of the church and a well-organized civil society created the conditions for the eventual emergence of accountable government. This historical sequencing has direct modern consequences. A society with a strong state but low social trust, in Fukuyama’s model, will rely on state-led economic development, while a high-trust society can generate prosperity more spontaneously from the bottom up. This concept of institutional path dependency suggests that “getting to Denmark”—Fukuyama’s shorthand for achieving a stable liberal democracy—is not a simple matter of adopting the right constitution or economic policies. 18 A society’s deep historical trajectory, specifically the sequence of its institutional development, powerfully constrains its present-day political and economic possibilities. This provides a compelling institutional counter-narrative to Diamond’s geographical determinism.

2.3. The Sovereignty of Choice: Graeber and Wengrow’s Radical Freedom

In their monumental work, The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity, anthropologist David Graeber and archaeologist David Wengrow mount a radical challenge to all linear, stage-based theories of human history. 29 They reject the foundational narratives of both Thomas Hobbes (that life before the state was a “war of all against all”) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (that humans lived in a state of childlike, egalitarian innocence before the corrupting invention of agriculture and private property). 30 Drawing on a vast array of recent archaeological and anthropological evidence, their central thesis is that for tens of thousands of years, our ancestors lived in a wide variety of complex social and political forms, consciously experimenting with different arrangements. 29

Graeber and Wengrow systematically dismantle what they call the “standard narrative.” They argue that the adoption of agriculture was not an irreversible trap that inevitably led to hierarchy, private property, and the state; rather, early peoples often engaged in “play farming” or shifted fluidly between foraging, horticulture, and agriculture, sometimes abandoning it altogether. 30 They present evidence of large, complex, and even urban settlements that existed for millennia without centralized rule, top-down administration, or significant social stratification. 30 Some societies, they show, even adopted seasonal political structures, alternating between hierarchical and egalitarian forms depending on the time of year. 30

A crucial element of their argument is the “Indigenous critique.” They contend that European Enlightenment ideals of liberty and equality were not homegrown but were profoundly shaped by the sophisticated critiques of European society—its lack of freedom, its inequality, its obsession with material wealth—offered by Native American intellectuals and leaders like the Wendat statesman Kondiaronk. 30 This intellectual contribution, they argue, was later erased by European thinkers who developed stage-based theories of social evolution to re-cast European civilization as the pinnacle of human development and Indigenous societies as primitive relics of a bygone era. 30 Consequently, Graeber and Wengrow propose that the fundamental question of history should not be “What are the origins of inequality?” but rather, “How did we get stuck?”. 30 They argue that we have lost three basic forms of social freedom that were once common: the freedom to move away and leave one’s community, the freedom to disobey arbitrary authority, and the freedom to create new social realities. 30

The book has been widely celebrated for its intellectual ambition and for challenging long-held assumptions, becoming an international bestseller. 30 However, it has also drawn criticism from some academics who argue that the authors “cherry-pick” evidence to fit their narrative, misinterpret sources, and advance an argument that is ultimately driven by their anarchist political commitments. 34

Ultimately, The Dawn of Everything is not just a new history but a meta-historical critique of the purpose of writing history. Graeber and Wengrow argue that grand narratives, whether from Diamond or Fukuyama, serve a conservative political function by presenting the current global order as the more-or-less inevitable outcome of deep structural or institutional forces. If hierarchy and the state are the necessary consequences of agriculture and large populations, then there is no realistic alternative. By demonstrating a past filled with political creativity, fluidity, and conscious self-organization, Graeber and Wengrow seek to prove that alternatives have always existed and are therefore possible again. 32 Their project is explicitly aimed at “un-sticking” our political imagination and re-opening the future to radical possibilities, directly challenging the perceived inevitability that underpins other grand historical theories. 30

2.4. A Dialogue of Grand Narratives: Structure, Institutions, and Agency

Placing these three monumental theories in direct conversation reveals that they are not simply offering different answers to the same question. Rather, they operate at different scales of analysis and are built upon fundamentally different philosophical assumptions about the nature of history and human agency. Diamond’s geographical determinism provides a powerful account of the deep structural constraints and opportunities that shaped the very long-term development of entire continents. Fukuyama’s institutional analysis offers a compelling explanation for why, within those broad environmental parameters, different societies developed such varied political structures, emphasizing the crucial role of ideas, culture, and path dependency. Graeber and Wengrow offer a radical critique of both, rejecting any form of determinism in favor of a history driven by human consciousness, political struggle, and the freedom to choose different forms of social life.

The following table provides a comparative framework, clarifying the core distinctions between these foundational approaches to macro-history.

This dialogue reveals the essential trade-offs in any attempt to write “big history.” Diamond achieves a parsimonious, powerful explanation at the cost of human agency. Graeber and Wengrow restore agency and complexity at the cost of a clear, overarching causal narrative. Fukuyama charts a middle path, acknowledging both structural constraints and the importance of cultural and political choices, but his framework struggles to escape a perceived teleology pointing toward a specific form of modern politics. Together, they define the intellectual landscape upon which more specific, quantitative models of historical change are now being built.

3. The Rhythms of Rise and Fall: The Science of Historical Dynamics

Moving from the sweeping, qualitative narratives that seek to explain the entire arc of human history, this section delves into a more focused and quantitative approach: the science of historical dynamics, or “cliodynamics.” Pioneered by scholars like Jack Goldstone and Peter Turchin, this field seeks to identify and model the predictable, recurring cycles of political integration and disintegration that appear to characterize complex societies. By treating history as a dataset, cliodynamics aims to move beyond narrative explanation to develop testable, mathematical theories of societal change.

3.1. The Demographic Engine: Jack Goldstone’s Structural-Demographic Theory

The foundational model for the field of cliodynamics is the Structural-Demographic Theory (SDT), first articulated by sociologist Jack Goldstone in his 1991 book, Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World. 37 Goldstone sought to explain why major state breakdowns and revolutions occurred in waves, simultaneously affecting diverse societies like Stuart England, Bourbon France, the Ottoman Empire, and Ming China in the 17th century. 39 He argued that these crises were not caused by unique political failings but by a common set of underlying structural pressures generated by long-term demographic trends. 37

SDT posits that societal stability is determined by the interplay of three interconnected sectors: the general population, the elites, and the state. 37 The engine of the model is population dynamics. Goldstone observed that a sustained period of population growth within the fixed resource base of an agrarian economy inevitably triggers a cascade of destabilizing effects 39:

1. Popular Immiseration: As the population grows, the labor supply outstrips demand, leading to falling real wages, rising food prices, and increased landlessness. This growing misery increases the mobilization potential of the general populace, making them more prone to riots, rebellions, and unrest. 41
2. Elite Overproduction: The same demographic growth also affects the elite. As elite families have more surviving children, the number of aspirants for a relatively fixed number of elite positions (in government, the church, or the landed aristocracy) swells. This leads to intense and often zero-sum competition among elites for wealth and status. This “elite overproduction” results in the fragmentation of the elite class, with growing numbers of disgruntled and downwardly mobile “counter-elites” willing to challenge the existing order to secure their own position. 39
3. State Fiscal Distress: The state becomes caught in a fiscal trap. Its expenses rise as it tries to manage a larger population and contain growing social unrest. Simultaneously, its revenues stagnate or fall. The impoverished masses cannot be taxed further, and the divided and competitive elites become increasingly resistant to taxation, seeking to preserve their own wealth. This leads to spiraling state debt, bankruptcy, and a loss of military control and state legitimacy. 41

When all three of these pressures—mass mobilization potential, elite conflict, and state weakness—peak simultaneously, the society enters a state of crisis. At this point, even a minor trigger, such as a harvest failure or a minor policy blunder, can set off a major state breakdown or revolution. 45

3.2. Cliodynamics: Peter Turchin’s New Science of History

Building directly on Goldstone’s foundation, biologist-turned-historian Peter Turchin has sought to expand SDT into a broader, more formalized research program he terms “cliodynamics”. 46 Cliodynamics aims to be a true “science of history,” using mathematical modeling, statistical analysis, and the construction of large historical databases to test theories of long-term social processes. 48

Turchin adopts Goldstone’s core demographic engine but enriches it with several key concepts. In works like Historical Dynamics and Secular Cycles (co-authored with Sergey Nefedov), he demonstrates that the pressures described by SDT tend to operate in long-term oscillations, or “secular cycles,” typically lasting two to three centuries. 52 These cycles consist of an integrative phase (characterized by population growth, social stability, and political expansion) followed by a predictable disintegrative phase (characterized by the onset of SDT pressures, leading to endemic instability and, often, state collapse). 53

To explain the forces of social cohesion that characterize the integrative phase, Turchin borrows and operationalizes the concept of asabiyyah from the 14th-century Arab scholar Ibn Khaldun. 58 Turchin defines asabiyyah as a society’s capacity for collective action and cooperation. 58 He argues that high levels of asabiyyah are not a default state but are forged in the crucible of intense and prolonged inter-group conflict, particularly at “metaethnic frontiers”—the fault lines between major civilizational or religious blocs, such as the border between Christian Europe and the Islamic world, or between sedentary agricultural states and nomadic pastoralists. 52

This leads to one of Turchin’s most provocative arguments, detailed in War and Peace and War and Ultrasociety: that warfare, paradoxically, has been the primary engine of large-scale human cooperation. 62 Through a process of cultural group selection, societies that developed stronger norms of cooperation and self-sacrifice were better able to compete in warfare, and thus survived and expanded at the expense of less cooperative groups. 64 War, in this view, is a force of “destructive creation” that drives the evolution of ever-larger and more complex states. 65

In his more recent work, such as Ages of Discord, Turchin has applied the SDT model to the history of the United States, placing particular emphasis on elite overproduction as the most potent and dangerous driver of political instability in modern, complex societies. 56 He argues that trends such as soaring wealth inequality, the overproduction of law graduates and other elite aspirants, and growing political polarization are quantifiable indicators that the U.S. has entered a disintegrative phase, predicting a peak of instability in the 2020s. 70

The central and most powerful insight of the Goldstone-Turchin model is its counter-intuitive explanation for the engine of societal collapse. While popular discontent and misery are necessary ingredients for a crisis, they are not the primary cause. The cycle begins in a period of stability and prosperity, which fuels population growth. This growth eventually creates a labor surplus, which drives down wages for the general population. Critically, this phase of “popular immiseration” is initially highly beneficial for the existing elites, whose wealth and profits are magnified by the availability of cheap labor. This expanding pool of wealth then fuels “elite overproduction,” as more individuals are drawn to seek elite status and existing elite families expand. This creates a volatile situation of intense, zero-sum competition within the elite class for a limited number of powerful positions. It is this internal conflict among a bloated and fractured elite that ultimately shatters state institutions. Frustrated “counter-elites,” blocked from power, are then incentivized to mobilize the widespread popular discontent to challenge the established order. This model suggests that the most perilous moments for a society are not necessarily when conditions are worst for the masses, but when the gap between the elites and the masses is vast, and the elite class itself is large, insecure, and internally divided. The revolution, in this view, is ultimately triggered and led by disaffected members of the elite.

3.3. Case Studies in Societal Disintegration

The explanatory power of the cliodynamic framework can be illustrated by applying it to specific historical instances of societal crisis and collapse.

The Storm Before The Storm: The Roman Republic

Mike Duncan’s narrative of the final century of the Roman Republic serves as a textbook case study of the structural-demographic model in action. 73 The Republic’s immense imperial expansion following the Punic Wars created the conditions for a classic secular cycle. The massive influx of wealth and enslaved people from conquered territories led to soaring inequality. 75 Small landholding citizen-farmers, the traditional backbone of the Roman army, were displaced by large, slave-run estates (latifundia) owned by the senatorial elite, leading to mass migration to Rome and widespread popular immiseration. 75 This created a volatile urban proletariat, ripe for mobilization by populist leaders.

Simultaneously, the vast new wealth fueled intense elite overproduction. Competition for political office, prestige, and military commands became ferocious and violent. 77 The traditional political norms that had governed the Republic for centuries—the mos maiorum—crumbled under the pressure. 77 Ambitious individuals like Marius and Sulla bypassed traditional state structures, creating private armies loyal to themselves rather than to the Republic, a clear symptom of elite fragmentation and the state’s loss of its monopoly on violence. 75 The political violence that began with the murder of the Gracchi brothers, who attempted to address the land crisis, escalated into full-blown civil wars between rival elite factions. The collapse of the Republic was not a singular event but the culmination of a decades-long disintegrative phase driven by the pressures of popular misery and, most critically, unchecked intra-elite conflict. 77

The Black Jacobins: The Haitian Revolution

C.L.R. James’s seminal work, The Black Jacobins, provides a powerful case study of revolution in a colonial context, which can also be analyzed through a cliodynamic lens. 81 The French colony of San Domingo in the late 18th century was a society defined by extreme structural pressures. Popular immiseration was absolute in the form of chattel slavery, under which half a million people endured brutal conditions. 82 The elite structure was profoundly and racially fragmented, divided into competing factions of wealthy white planters (grands blancs), poorer whites (petits blancs), and the free people of color (gens de couleur), who were often wealthy but politically disenfranchised. 81 This created multiple, overlapping lines of intra-elite conflict.

The French Revolution of 1789 acted as a massive external shock that shattered the fragile cohesion of the colonial ruling class. 83 As the different elite factions battled each other and the revolutionary government in France for control, they created a power vacuum and a state of near-constant civil war. This elite fragmentation and the collapse of state authority provided the opportunity for the enslaved population—a hyper-mobilized mass with profound grievances—to launch their own revolt. 86 Under the leadership of Toussaint L’Ouverture, a former slave who became a brilliant political and military strategist, the slave rebellion transformed into a successful revolution that defeated multiple European armies and established the independent state of Haiti. 83 The Haitian case demonstrates how extreme popular misery, combined with a deeply fractured elite, can lead not just to state collapse but to a fundamental overturning of the entire social order.

The Death of Yugoslavia: Modern State Collapse

The dissolution of Yugoslavia, as chronicled by Laura Silber and Allan Little, offers a modern example of state collapse driven by the decay of social cohesion, or asabiyyah. 88 The multi-ethnic Yugoslav state was held together by the overarching authority of Josip Broz Tito and the ideology of the Communist Party, which suppressed but did not eliminate underlying national identities. 90 After Tito’s death in 1980 and the onset of a severe economic crisis in that decade (a form of popular immiseration), this federal asabiyyah began to crumble. 89

In this environment of state decay and economic hardship, nationalist leaders like Slobodan Milošević in Serbia and Franjo Tuđman in Croatia emerged as powerful counter-elites. 88 They systematically dismantled the federal state in their struggle for power, mobilizing popular discontent by appealing to historical grievances and constructing new, competing forms of asabiyyah based on narrow ethno-nationalist identities. 88 The ensuing wars were a manifestation of extreme intra-elite conflict, with these new nationalist elites carving up the territory and resources of the former state. 88 The case of Yugoslavia illustrates how, in the absence of a strong, unifying collective identity, a disintegrative phase can lead to the violent fragmentation of a state along pre-existing ethnic or cultural fault lines. 89

4. The Human Element: Micro-Foundations of Social Order

While macro-historical models identify broad patterns of societal change, they rest upon a foundation of individual and small-group behaviors. To fully understand the engines of history, it is necessary to examine the underlying evolutionary, psychological, and cultural mechanisms that enable human beings to cooperate in vast “ultrasocieties,” create the social fabric of trust and morality, and divide into fiercely competitive groups. This section explores these micro-foundations, connecting the dynamics of genes, minds, and culture to the grand sweep of history.

4.1. The Evolutionary Basis of Ultrasociety

The existence of large-scale cooperation among genetically unrelated individuals is an evolutionary puzzle. From a purely individualistic perspective, altruism and self-sacrifice should be selected against, as selfish individuals would reap the benefits of cooperation without paying the costs. The theoretical solution to this puzzle lies in multilevel selection theory, as formalized by philosophers of science like Samir Okasha in Evolution and the Levels of Selection. 93 The theory posits that natural selection can operate on multiple levels of the biological hierarchy simultaneously—on genes, individuals, and groups. 93 The core insight is that while selfish individuals may outcompete altruistic individuals within a single group, groups composed of more altruists will be more effective and will outcompete groups of selfish individuals. 98 When between-group competition is sufficiently intense, it can override the force of within-group selection and favor the evolution of cooperative traits. 66

In humans, this process is supercharged by cultural evolution. As detailed in the volume Cultural Evolution edited by Peter J. Richerson and Morten H. Christiansen, culture—defined as socially transmitted information, including norms, beliefs, and institutions—becomes a primary system of inheritance and adaptation. 101 Cultural evolution allows for much more rapid adaptation than genetic evolution because successful norms and strategies can spread quickly through social learning, without waiting for genetic change. 104 This provides a direct theoretical foundation for Peter Turchin’s argument in Ultrasociety. Turchin contends that intense, often violent, competition between human groups has been the primary selective force driving the evolution of the norms and institutions that underpin large-scale cooperation. 65

This synthesis of multilevel selection and cultural evolution provides a robust scientific basis for Turchin’s seemingly paradoxical claim that war is the mother of cooperation. The logic unfolds as follows: Okasha’s framework establishes the theoretical conditions under which group-level selection can occur. Turchin identifies warfare as the most potent form of between-group selection in human history. The work of cultural evolutionists like Richerson and Christiansen demonstrates that cultural traits—such as patriotic ideologies, norms of self-sacrifice, and effective military organization—can be selected for at the group level. Therefore, over the long run, societies that developed cultural packages promoting high levels of internal cooperation were more likely to survive, win wars, and expand, thereby spreading those very cooperative norms. This creates a tragic but powerful feedback loop in human history: the very “better angels” of our nature, such as altruism, loyalty, and group solidarity, may have been forged and scaled up by our “darker angels”—our capacity for lethal intergroup violence. This evolutionary dynamic profoundly complicates any simple, progressive narrative of moral development.

4.2. The Fabric of Community: Trust and Social Capital

The cooperative norms selected for by cultural evolution manifest in society as social capital: the networks, norms, and trust that facilitate coordination and cooperation for mutual benefit. 105 This concept has a long lineage, traceable to Alexis de Tocqueville’s 19th-century observations in Democracy in America on the vibrant landscape of civic associations that he saw as the bedrock of American democracy. 106

In the late 20th century, political scientist Robert Putnam reinvigorated this line of inquiry with his seminal work, Bowling Alone. 109 Using a vast array of data, Putnam documented a steep decline in many forms of face-to-face civic engagement in the United States since the 1960s—from participation in political parties and PTAs to, famously, bowling in leagues. 109 He attributed this erosion of social capital to several factors, including generational change, the rise of television as a privatizing form of leisure, and suburban sprawl. 109 This decline, he argued, has had corrosive effects on American society, leading to lower levels of trust in government and in each other, and weakening the foundations of democratic life. 109 The documentary Join or Die further popularizes this thesis, framing the renewal of civic association as essential to overcoming America’s current democratic crisis. 115

Putnam’s concept of social capital is directly linked to Francis Fukuyama’s analysis of trust as a prerequisite for economic prosperity and Pete Buttigieg’s more recent argument that trust is the essential foundation for effective governance in a complex, polarized world. 24 Fukuyama, in particular, argues that a high level of generalized trust is what enables the creation of the large, flexible organizations that are the hallmark of modern economies. 21

However, the concept of social capital is not monolithic. A crucial distinction, highlighted by Putnam himself, exists between “bonding” social capital, which reinforces exclusive identities and links people who are similar, and “bridging” social capital, which connects people across diverse social cleavages. 109 This distinction is critical for understanding its varied societal effects. Fukuyama’s concept of the “radius of trust” is analogous; low-trust societies are often rich in bonding capital (strong family and clan ties) but poor in the bridging capital needed to foster cooperation among strangers, thus limiting the scale of economic and political organization. 21 This connects directly to Turchin’s concept of asabiyyah. A powerful asabiyyah forged in the heat of intergroup conflict is a form of intense bonding capital. It is highly effective for competition against an external enemy but can become destructive to a large, pluralistic state if it cannot be transformed into a broader, bridging identity that encompasses the whole society. The violent collapse of Yugoslavia is a stark example of a state rich in bonding social capital (in the form of resurgent Serbian, Croatian, and Bosnian nationalist networks) but catastrophically lacking in the bridging capital needed to maintain the larger federal entity. This reveals that the type of social capital, not just its quantity, is a key determinant of a society’s trajectory. The decline that Putnam documents may be understood more specifically as an erosion of the bridging capital that once united disparate groups of Americans, leaving behind a more fragmented landscape of mutually distrustful, bonded groups.

4.3. The Moral Matrix: The Psychology of Cohesion and Division

If trust and social capital form the fabric of society, then morality is the thread from which it is woven. In The Righteous Mind, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt provides a powerful framework for understanding the psychological underpinnings of morality and its role in both uniting and dividing human groups. 122 Haidt argues that moral judgments are not primarily the product of cool, dispassionate reason. Instead, he proposes a social intuitionist model, famously captured in the metaphor of the elephant and the rider. 123 The elephant represents our intuitions and emotions—fast, automatic, and powerful processes that drive our moral judgments. The rider represents conscious reasoning, which acts less like a noble philosopher seeking truth and more like a press secretary, constructing post-hoc justifications for the elephant’s intuitive leanings. 123

Haidt’s Moral Foundations Theory posits that our moral intuitions are structured by at least six innate psychological systems, or “moral taste buds,” that evolved to solve recurrent adaptive challenges. 124 These foundations are:

1. Care/Harm: Evolved for the protection of vulnerable offspring.
2. Fairness/Cheating: Evolved to reap the benefits of reciprocal altruism.
3. Loyalty/Betrayal: Evolved for forming cohesive coalitions.
4. Authority/Subversion: Evolved to navigate hierarchical social structures.
5. Sanctity/Degradation: Evolved to avoid pathogens and contaminants.
6. Liberty/Oppression: Evolved to resist domination by alpha bullies.

The theory’s most significant application is in explaining political polarization. 123 Through extensive surveys, Haidt and his colleagues found that political liberals tend to build their moral worldview primarily on the Care, Fairness, and Liberty foundations. Conservatives, in contrast, draw more evenly upon all six. 123 This means that liberals and conservatives are not just disagreeing on policy; they are operating in different “moral matrices,” often talking past one another because they do not recognize the legitimacy of each other’s foundational moral concerns. 128 Morality, Haidt concludes, “binds and blinds”. 124 It binds us into cohesive ideological teams but blinds us to the perspectives and moral reasoning of those on other teams.

Haidt’s theory provides the psychological micro-foundations for the macro-level phenomena of elite fragmentation and political polarization described by Peter Turchin. Turchin’s cliodynamic model identifies intra-elite conflict as the central driver of societal instability. Haidt’s work explains why this conflict becomes so intractable and venomous. It is not merely a rational disagreement over resources or policies but a clash between fundamentally different moral worldviews. In their struggle for power, counter-elites do not simply offer alternative policies; they activate different moral foundations to mobilize their supporters, framing their political opponents not just as mistaken, but as immoral, sacrilegious, or treacherous. This suggests that the disintegrative phases of Turchin’s secular cycles are characterized by a “moral decoupling,” where competing elite factions can no longer appeal to a shared moral framework. The binding function of morality, which normally fosters societal cohesion, instead works to bind factions ever more tightly while blinding them to any possibility of common ground, thus pouring psychological fuel on the fires of structural-demographic pressure.

4.4. The Code of Culture: Language as a Co-Evolutionary Force

The transmission of the complex cultural systems of trust, social capital, and morality across generations and between vast numbers of people depends on a fundamental human technology: language. David Anthony’s The Horse, the Wheel, and Language provides a compelling case study of how language functions as a vehicle for cultural expansion. 129 He demonstrates that the spread of the Indo-European language family was not a purely linguistic event but was tied to the diffusion of a powerful technological and cultural package: a pastoralist lifestyle enabled by the domestication of the horse and the invention of the wheeled wagon. 130 This package allowed its speakers to expand rapidly across the Eurasian steppe, carrying with them not just their language but also a specific set of social institutions, such as patron-client relationships, which were encoded and transmitted through that language. 130

While Anthony shows how a language family can spread, Morten Christiansen and Nick Chater, in The Language Game, offer a theory of why language has the structure it does. 133 They argue against the Chomskyan idea of an innate, hardwired “universal grammar,” proposing instead that language is itself a product of cultural evolution. 135 Languages, they contend, have adapted over generations to be learnable and usable by the human brain, with its specific cognitive constraints, such as the “Now-or-Never” bottleneck of working memory. 138 Language is not a rigid code but a flexible, improvised tool for cooperative communication, more akin to a game of charades where meaning is constructed collaboratively in context. 133

Synthesizing these perspectives reveals language as the essential operating system for cultural evolution and the scaling of human sociality. Large-scale cooperation, as described by Fukuyama and Putnam, requires shared norms and a collective identity. These cultural elements, as cultural evolutionists show, must be transmitted with high fidelity. Language is the primary medium for this transmission, allowing for the creation of the shared myths, religions, and ideologies (as described in Yuval Noah Harari’s Sapiens) that bind large groups of strangers. 141 The expansion of the Indo-European languages was therefore the expansion of a cultural “operating system” that enabled a particular form of social organization to scale up dramatically. This implies a profound co-evolutionary loop: our pre-existing cognitive abilities shaped the initial forms of language, and this culturally evolved language then shaped our capacity for complex social organization. This new level of social organization, in turn, created new selective pressures on both our culture and, potentially over the longue durée, on our genes, in a continuous feedback cycle between biology and culture.

5. Contemporary Debates and Future Horizons

The effort to construct a comprehensive science of human social dynamics is fraught with profound methodological and philosophical debates. This final section addresses two such frontiers: the contentious debate over the long-term trajectory of violence, which pits quantitative analysis against historical context, and the speculative use of concepts from quantum physics as metaphors to grapple with the inherent complexity and uncertainty of the social world.

5.1. The Trajectory of Violence: The Pinker Controversy

In his influential book, The Better Angels of Our Nature, cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker makes a bold empirical claim: violence of all kinds has been in a long-term, dramatic, and quantifiable decline over the course of human history. 143 He marshals a vast array of statistical data, from archaeological evidence of prehistoric death rates to modern homicide statistics and records of battle deaths, to argue that we are living in the most peaceful era in the existence of our species. 143 Pinker attributes this decline to several historical forces: the rise of the state with its monopoly on legitimate force (the “Leviathan”), the civilizing effect of commerce (“gentle commerce”), the expansion of reason and rationality since the Enlightenment, and a growing circle of empathy driven by cosmopolitanism and literacy. 143

This optimistic thesis has been met with a comprehensive and forceful rebuttal from a collective of seventeen historians in the volume The Darker Angels of Our Nature, edited by Philip Dwyer and Mark Micale. 147 The historians’ critique is not a simple disagreement over interpretation but a fundamental challenge to Pinker’s methodology and his entire narrative of progress. 150 They argue that Pinker’s use of statistics is selective and often flawed; he relies on pre-modern data that is notoriously unreliable and sometimes misinterprets his sources. 146 For example, his estimates for the death tolls of events like the An Lushan Rebellion are based on outdated and untenable assumptions. 154

More fundamentally, the critics contend that Pinker employs a narrow and ahistorical definition of violence. 146 By focusing primarily on quantifiable metrics like homicide rates and deaths in battle, he overlooks the transformation of violence in the modern era. The modern state, they argue, did not so much eliminate violence as monopolize, bureaucratize, and rationalize it. 146 This led to new and unprecedented forms of systemic violence—such as colonialism, industrial-scale warfare, scientific racism, and mass incarceration—that are not adequately captured by Pinker’s chosen metrics. 146 The decline in the personal homicide rate in London, for instance, occurred concurrently with a massive expansion of brutal violence throughout the British Empire. 152 The critics also charge that Pinker’s narrative is deeply Eurocentric, attributing progress to the European Enlightenment while largely ignoring the immense violence that European expansion inflicted upon the rest of the world. 146

The Pinker versus Darker Angels debate thus reveals a profound clash of methodologies and definitions. Pinker, approaching the problem as a cognitive scientist, prioritizes quantifiable data that can be compared across long timescales. The historians argue that such an approach strips violence of its context, meaning, and changing nature. They contend that the “real story of human violence” is qualitative and contextual; a decline in one metric can mask a catastrophic rise in another. 148 This debate exposes the inherent limitations of a purely quantitative approach to complex social phenomena and challenges the very possibility of identifying a single, linear “trend” in something as multifaceted as human violence.

5.2. Quantum Metaphors for a Complex World

The predictive ambition of cliodynamics, with its use of differential equations to model societal cycles, can be seen as an attempt to create a “Newtonian” science of history—one based on deterministic laws governing the interactions of societal components. 46 However, the social world is characterized by levels of complexity, reflexivity, and uncertainty that may defy such classical models. As a result, some scholars in the emerging field of “quantum social science” have begun to explore the principles of quantum physics not as a direct explanation for social phenomena, but as a rich source of metaphors for understanding the unique nature of social systems. 158

As explained in books like The New Quantum Universe, the quantum realm operates according to principles that are deeply counter-intuitive from a classical perspective. 160 Concepts such as the uncertainty principle (the impossibility of simultaneously knowing a particle’s exact position and momentum), complementarity (the ability of an entity like light to behave as both a particle and a wave), entanglement (a state where two or more particles are linked in such a way that the state of one instantly affects the others, regardless of distance), and the observer effect (the act of measurement fundamentally altering the state of the system being measured) describe a reality that is probabilistic, interconnected, and participatory. 158

These concepts offer powerful metaphors for social reality. 163 Human agency and creativity introduce a radical unpredictability that challenges deterministic models, echoing quantum uncertainty. Social phenomena often exhibit complementarity; for example, a society can be understood simultaneously as a collection of individuals and as a holistic entity with emergent properties that are not reducible to its parts. The deep, non-local interconnectedness of individuals within a shared culture, bound by language and norms, can be likened to entanglement. 158 Perhaps most compellingly, the social sciences are defined by the observer effect: the act of studying a society—whether through polling, ethnography, or publishing a book like Bowling Alone—inevitably changes the society being studied. 158

This suggests a philosophical limit to the predictive science of history. While cliodynamics can reveal powerful structural pressures and identify periods of heightened risk with probabilistic accuracy, it may never achieve the precise, deterministic predictions of classical physics. The subject matter of history is fundamentally reflexive; human beings can learn from historical patterns and consciously act to change them. The quantum metaphor provides a conceptual framework for a more humble, probabilistic, and agency-aware social science—one that embraces the inherent complexity and uncertainty of the human world rather than attempting to model it away. This perspective brings the analysis full circle, creating a bridge between the mathematical aspirations of Turchin and the profound emphasis on freedom and contingency articulated by Graeber and Wengrow. History may indeed have rhythms and patterns, but the music is ultimately composed by its participants.

6. Conclusion

6.1. Synthesis: Toward an Integrated Model of Societal Dynamics

This comprehensive survey of contemporary theories of societal dynamics reveals a field of immense intellectual vitality, characterized by competing paradigms that operate at different scales of analysis and are built on divergent philosophical foundations. The analysis demonstrates that no single theory holds a monopoly on explaining the complex tapestry of human history. A robust and nuanced understanding requires the integration of insights from all three layers of inquiry: the grand narratives of civilizational development, the cyclical models of historical dynamics, and the micro-foundations of human social behavior.

The report’s central conclusion is a forceful rejection of monocausal explanations for the fates of human societies. Geography, as Jared Diamond argues, provides the stage and the raw materials, setting broad parameters for development over the longue durée. Yet within those parameters, institutions and ideas, as Francis Fukuyama details, write the script, creating path-dependent trajectories that lead to vastly different political and economic outcomes. And as David Graeber and David Wengrow provocatively assert, historical actors are never mere puppets of these structural forces; they possess the agency to interpret, resist, and radically rewrite the script.

Superimposed upon these grand trajectories are the powerful, recurring rhythms of cliodynamics. The structural-demographic models of Jack Goldstone and Peter Turchin reveal the deep undertows of population pressure and resource competition that generate predictable cycles of integration and disintegration. These models provide an indispensable analytical tool, demonstrating how factors like popular immiseration and, most critically, elite overproduction can create periods of extreme political instability. The micro-foundational theories provide the final layer of explanation, revealing the human behaviors that generate these macro-level currents. The evolutionary logic of multilevel selection, the cultural dynamics of trust and social capital, the psychological architecture of our moral minds, and the co-evolution of language and social complexity are the essential components from which all human societies are built.

6.2. Future Directions for Research

This integrated, multi-scale framework offers a powerful lens for understanding our contemporary “Age of Discord.” The structural pressures identified by cliodynamics—soaring inequality, elite overproduction, and state fiscal strain—are clearly visible in many nations today. The erosion of bridging social capital and generalized trust, as documented by Putnam and Fukuyama, has left societies fragmented and brittle. And the political polarization that paralyzes so many democracies is fueled by the clash of different moral matrices, as explained by Jonathan Haidt. Navigating the turbulent decades ahead will require more than technocratic policy solutions. It demands a deep, historically-informed understanding of the complex and recursive interplay between structure, institutions, and the enduring, often contradictory, engines of human nature.

Future research should focus on refining this integrated model. A key avenue is the development of more sophisticated quantitative models that incorporate not just demographic and economic variables, but also proxies for social capital and political polarization, bridging the gap between cliodynamics and social psychology. Further comparative historical analysis is needed to test the limits of these models beyond their typical focus on agrarian empires and modern Western states. Finally, exploring the reflexive nature of historical understanding itself—how our awareness of these very cycles and pressures might influence our collective response to them—represents a critical frontier. The search for patterns in the past is not merely an academic exercise; it is an essential tool for comprehending the present and shaping a more stable and just future.

Works Cited

1. Guns, Germs, and Steel

2. Guns, Germs, and Steel - Wikipedia

3. Guns, Germs, and Steel Chapter Summaries - eNotes.com

4. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies by Jared Diamond - Goodreads

5. Guns, Germs, and Steel | Summary, Criticism, Awards, & Jared Diamond - Britannica

6. Guns, Germs and Steel: A Short History of Everybody for the Last 13,000 Years - PMC

7. GUNS, GERMS, AND STEEL - Kashf Journal of Multidisciplinary Research

8. Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond Plot Summary - LitCharts

9. Book Summary: Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond - James Clear

10. Book Summary: Guns, Germs and Steel by Jared Diamond - To Summarise

11. An Analysis of Jared Diamond’s Guns, Germs & Steel - Routledge

12. Criticisms of Guns, Germs and Steel - To Summarise

13. What are some of the main Anthropological criticisms of Jared Diamond’s Guns, Germs and Steel? - Reddit

14. Guns Germs and Steel by Jared Diamond Distorts History - Living Anthropologically

15. Retro Review: Jared Diamond—Guns, Germs, and Steel - Competitive Enterprise Institute

16. On criticisms of the book Guns, Germs, and Steel - Reddit

17. The Origins of Political Order

18. The Origins of Political Order - Wikipedia

19. The Origins of Political Order Summary - Four Minute Books

20. Book Summary: “The Origins of Political Order” by Francis Fukuyama - TechRatchet

21. Book Summary: “Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity” by Francis Fukuyama - The Ratchet of Technology

22. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity - Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

23. Trust by Francis Fukuyama - Simon & Schuster

24. Review of Trust by Francis Fukuyama - Columbia International Affairs Online

25. Social Capital and Civil Society - International Monetary Fund (IMF)

26. Review of The Origins of Political Order by Peter Stone - Marx & Philosophy Society

27. The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution - Goodreads

28. On Francis Fukuyama’s “Origins of Political Order” - Reddit

29. The Dawn of Everything - Wikipedia

30. The Dawn of Everything - Wikipedia

31. The Dawn Of Everything Summary and Study Guide - SuperSummary

32. Summary and Reviews of The Dawn of Everything by David Graeber - BookBrowse.com

33. As Deep as it is Vast: An Introduction to The Dawn of Everything - Commonplace

34. Everything Goes: Three Problems with The Dawn of Everything - Historical Materialism

35. ‘The Dawn of Everything’ gets human history wrong - Climate & Capitalism

36. Playing with history: a review of The Dawn of Everything - Overland literary journal

37. Structural-Demographic Theory - Sociopedia

38. Structural-demographic theory - Wikipedia

39. Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World - Routledge

40. Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World - Routledge

41. Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World by Jack A. Goldstone - LibraryThing

42. The 2010 structural-demographic forecast for the 2010–2020 decade - PMC

43. Demographic Structural Theory: 25 Years On - eScholarship

44. Structural-Demographic Theory - Peter Turchin

45. History as a giant data set - The Guardian

46. Cliodynamics - Wikipedia

47. Welcome to the “End Times”: Peter Turchin saw this coming - Salon.com

48. End Times by Peter Turchin - SoBrief

49. Cliodynamics, Volume 8, Issue 2, 2017 - eScholarship

50. Cliodynamics, Volume 2, Issue 1 - eScholarship

51. Cliodynamics, Volume 10, Issue 2, 2019 - eScholarship

52. Historical Dynamics - Peter Turchin

53. Secular Cycles by Peter Turchin - Goodreads

54. Secular Cycles - Peter Turchin

55. Book Review: Secular Cycles - LessWrong

56. On Salon’s review of Peter Turchin’s Ages of Discord - Reddit

57. End Times by Peter Turchin - SoBrief

58. Historical dynamics: Why states rise and fall - ResearchGate

59. Muqaddimah - Wikipedia

60. Understanding the Muqaddimah and Its Impact on Historical Analysis - Sedekahsg

61. Review: Peter Turchin’s “War and Peace and War” - words and dirt

62. War and Peace and War: The Rise and Fall of Empires by Peter Turchin - Goodreads

63. Cooperate to Compete: An Overview of Ultrasociety by Peter Turchin - Darwinian Business

64. War and Peace and War: The Rise and Fall of Empires by Peter Turchin - Goodreads

65. Cooperate To Compete: An Overview of ‘Ultrasociety’, by Peter Turchin - Darwinian Business

66. Review of Ultra Society by Peter Turchin - George Mason University

67. Review of Ultrasociety in Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture - Peter Turchin

68. Book Review: Ages of Discord by Peter Turchin - Medium

69. Ages of Discord—review - Compassionate Spirit

70. Book Review: Ages Of Discord - Slate Star Codex

71. Cliodynamics: a science for predicting the future - ZDNET

72. Elite overproduction - Wikipedia

73. The Storm Before the Storm Summary by Mike Duncan - Shortform

74. Mike Duncan, “The Storm Before The Storm” - YouTube

75. The Storm Before the Storm Book Summary by Mike Duncan - Shortform

76. The Storm Before the Storm: The Beginning of the End of the Roman Republic - YouTube

77. The Storm Before the Storm by Mike Duncan – Book Review - Cannonball Read 17

78. The Storm Before the Storm by Mike Duncan - Hachette Book Group

79. The Storm Before the Storm: An Interview With Historian Mike Duncan - Daily Stoic

80. Book Review: “The Storm Before the Storm” - Northwest Progressive Institute

81. The Black Jacobins: a Class Analysis of Revolution - Postcolonial Web

82. The Black Jacobins - Wikipedia

83. The Black Jacobins Summary and Study Guide - SuperSummary

84. CLR James and the Black Jacobins - International Socialism

85. The Black Jacobins - International Socialist Review

86. The Black Jacobins by CLR James - Center for Political Education

87. The Black Jacobins by C.L.R. James: 12 Minute Summary - YouTube

88. Yugoslavia: Death of a Nation by Laura Silber - Goodreads

89. The Death Of Yugoslavia - PDF Document

90. The Death of Yugoslavia: Enter Nationalism 1/6 - YouTube

91. The Death of Yugoslavia - Wikipedia

92. Part I of “The Death of Yugoslavia” - Reddit

93. Samir Okasha, Evolution and the Levels of Selection - SciELO México

94. Evolution and the Levels of Selection - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

95. Identifying Causes of Social Evolution: Contextual Analysis - Frontiers

96. Review of Samir Okasha’s Evolution and the Levels of Selection - ResearchGate

97. Samir Okasha, Evolution and the Levels of Selection - Cambridge Core

98. Group selection - Wikipedia

99. Multilevel cultural evolution: From new theory to practical applications - PNAS

100. Multilevel selection on individual and group social behaviour in the wild - PubMed Central

101. Cultural Evolution - PenguinRandomHouse.com

102. Cultural Evolution of the Structure of Human Groups - ResearchGate

103. Review of Cultural Evolution - ResearchGate

104. The Cultural Evolution of Technology - UBC Psychology

105. SOCIAL CAPITAL - WBCSD

106. Democracy in America by Alexis de Tocqueville - EBSCO Research Starters

107. Democracy in America - Wikipedia

108. Democracy in America by Alexis de Toqueville Plot Summary - LitCharts

109. Bowling Alone - Wikipedia

110. Bowling Alone by Robert Putnam: Summary - Beyond Intractability

111. Bowling Alone - Official Website

112. Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America - UVM

113. Bowling Alone – Summary Notes - ForCharlotte

114. Bowling Alone Summary and Study Guide - SuperSummary

115. Join or Die - Documentary Educational Resources

116. JOIN OR DIE: A film about why you should join a club

117. Join Or Die - Official Trailer - YouTube

118. Trust: A Conversation With Pete Buttigieg - YouTube

119. Trust Book Summary by Pete Buttigieg - Shortform

120. Trust as an element of social capital - Journal of International Studies

121. Social Capital: Why We Need It and How We Can Create More of It - Brookings Institution

122. Book Review: The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt - LSE Review of Books

123. The Righteous Mind / Jonathan Haidt - Unter Soziologen

124. Book Summary: The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt - To Summarise

125. The Righteous Mind - SoBrief

126. Moral Foundations Theory Explained by Jonathan Haidt - Divided We Fall

127. Haidt’s 6 Innate Moral Foundations - Atlas of Public Management

128. Moral Foundation Theory and the Law - Seattle University Law Review

129. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language Summary - Blinkist

130. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language - Wikipedia

131. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language Summary of Key Ideas - Blinkist

132. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language - Barnes & Noble

133. The Language Game by Morten H. Christiansen - Hachette Book Group

134. The Language Game by Morten H. Christiansen - Goodreads

135. The Language Game by Morten H. Christiansen - Goodreads

136. Book Review: The Language Game - Inverarity

137. The Language Game: How improvisation created language and changed the world - Goodreads

138. The Language Game - SoBrief

139. New book reintegrates the science of language - Cornell Chronicle

140. The Language Game: How Improvisation Created Language and Changed the World - Next Big Idea Club

141. Sapiens A Graphic History, Volume 3 by Yuval Noah Harari - Penguin Books New Zealand

142. Book Summary: Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari - James Clear

143. The Better Angels of Our Nature - Wikipedia

144. The Better Angels of Our Nature: A Profound Summary - Medium

145. Review: “The Better Angels of Our Nature” by Steven Pinker - Hannah Givens Blog

146. Book Review of The Darker Angels of Our Nature - Matrix: A Journal for Matricultural Studies

147. Review of The Darker Angels of Our Nature - University of Toronto Press

148. “The Darker Angels of Our Nature: Refuting the Pinker Theory” - YouTube

149. The Darker Angels of Our Nature - Bloomsbury

150. The Darker Angels of Our Nature - University of Illinois

151. Bowling Alone at Twenty - National Affairs

152. Review of The Darker Angels of Our Nature - World History Connected

153. Is Steven Pinker’s The Better Angels of Our Nature Bad History? - Reddit

154. We do seem to have better angels after all - Human Economics

155. Critique of Steven Pinker’s ‘Better Angels’ and ‘Enlightenment Now’ - Reddit

156. Book Review of The Darker Angels of Our Nature - Matrix: A Journal for Matricultural Studies

157. Cliodynamics and the Dangers of Prophesy - Conjecture Magazine

158. Quantum social science - Wikipedia

159. The Quantum Turn in Social Science - The Abs-Tract Organization

160. The New Quantum Universe - ResearchGate

161. The New Quantum Universe - Miami University Campus Store

162. The New Quantum Universe - Cambridge University Press

163. Quantum Metaphors - American Scientist

164. How Physics is Reflected in Society and Social Life - Journal of NeuroPhilosophy