The Confluence of Code and Creed: An In-Depth Report on Techno-Spiritualism and the Philosophy of Belief

1. Introduction: Defining Techno-Spiritualism and its Interdisciplinary Scope

Techno-spiritualism represents a multifaceted phenomenon at the complex intersection where technology converges with spiritual or religious beliefs. This convergence manifests in various forms, ranging from the explicit spiritualization of technology itself to the pursuit of traditional spiritual objectives through technological means, and even the emergence of entirely new belief systems centered around technological advancements.

One perspective views techno-spiritualism with a degree of apprehension, framing it as a contemporary attempt by Artificial Intelligence (AI) to “replace God” by offering solutions to fundamental human limitations, including mortality. 1 This critical viewpoint often characterizes it as a “humanist ideology in which technology—not God or other theistic concepts—is used as a means for satisfying the human quest for meaning and spiritual salvation”. 1 Such a stance positions technology as a rival to established divine authority, suggesting a secular displacement of traditional religious functions.

Conversely, the term “techno-spirituality” offers a more integrative understanding. It describes the process by which existing faith and belief systems are integrated with “technoculture”—a broad concept encompassing the artifacts, processes, knowledge, and underlying attitudes that shape our technologically driven world. 2 This approach aims to honor traditional worldviews while actively engaging with modern technological advancements. It emphasizes an “awareness of technology and its effects upon our faith, our communities and our world” to integrate it in a manner that “honors God and his Kingdom”. 2 This demonstrates a desire to find spiritual meaning and purpose within, rather than in opposition to, a technologically advanced society.

Closely related is “cyber-spirituality,” which specifically examines the intersection of spirituality and technology within digital contexts. This area highlights both the opportunities for enhanced spiritual experiences and the inherent risks associated with digital security and the authenticity of online interactions. 3 It explores how technology influences perceptions of spiritual matters and advocates for self-reflection and balance in navigating both digital and physical experiences. 3

Another significant concept is “techno-animism,” which finds particular resonance in Japanese culture, tracing many of its roots to the Shinto religion. 4 This cultural practice involves imbuing technology with human and spiritual characteristics, thereby blurring the conventional boundaries between human, animal, spiritual, and mechanical beings. This approach fosters a harmonious coexistence with non-human entities and facilitates the integration of new technology into human society by instilling traditional values within its design and interaction. 4

The study of techno-spiritualism necessitates a profoundly interdisciplinary approach, drawing insights from philosophy, religious studies, sociology, anthropology, computer science, and cultural studies. This field challenges conventional distinctions between the sacred and the secular, the natural and the artificial, and even the traditional separation of mind and body. 2 The report will explore how technology shapes our worldview, influences human experience, and redefines our understanding of consciousness, purpose, and transcendence. 6 It will delve into “problematic aspects of technology that spirituality helps identify” and “commonly inadvertent aspects of spirituality that technology brings to the fore”. 7

The varying definitions of techno-spiritualism reveal a fundamental tension in the discourse: is technology a rival to divine authority or a tool for spiritual expression and growth? This fluidity in definition is crucial for a nuanced analysis, as it encompasses both radical, secularizing movements that view technology as a new form of divinity, and adaptive, traditional religious responses that seek to find spiritual meaning within a technological world. Recognizing this definitional spectrum allows for a more precise exploration of the underlying philosophical stances.

The emergence of techno-spiritualism is not merely a contemporary trend but a recontextualization of enduring human quests. Humanity has consistently sought to overcome mortality, find meaning and purpose, connect with the transcendent, and extend its capabilities. 1 Technology, in its various forms, provides new means for these ancient aspirations, shifting the locus of salvation or transcendence from solely divine intervention to human ingenuity and creation. This historical continuity provides a deeper narrative context for understanding the modern phenomenon.

A profound philosophical implication of techno-spiritualism is the erosion of traditional ontological categories. Advanced machines have made “thoroughly ambiguous the difference between natural and artificial, mind and body, self-developing and externally designed”. 2 This blurring is evident in concepts like techno-animism, which embraces a “polymorphous perversity” that disregards boundaries between different forms of being. 4 This challenges fundamental understandings of what it means to be human, what constitutes life, and the nature of reality itself, leading to new philosophical questions about identity, agency, and existence. It compels a re-evaluation of dualistic thinking, such as mind-body or sacred-secular, in an increasingly integrated world.

The following table provides a clear overview of key concepts within techno-spiritualism, establishing a foundational understanding for the subsequent discussion.

2. Historical Trajectories: Technology, Belief, and the Divine

The intertwining of technology and religious or spiritual belief is not a modern phenomenon; it possesses deep historical roots, demonstrating a continuous human engagement with the divine through crafted artifacts and knowledge.

2.1. Ancient Concepts of Technology and Divinity

In Greco-Roman antiquity, technē (art, craft, skill) and mēchanica (mechanics) were instrumental in creating and sustaining a sense of the divine. 19 The ancient Greek word technē refers to an art, craft, or skill, distinct from episteme (passive knowledge), focusing on “doing or making” and always being instrumental in changing and creating. 20 This practical knowledge was applied in various sacred contexts. For instance, theatrical cranes (mēchanē) were employed to fabricate epiphanies of gods on stage, literally bringing divine figures into the human realm, while the science of reflection (catoptrics) was used to enhance the sacred presence within temples. 19 Religious processions also incorporated “technologies of automation” to create spectacular and awe-inspiring displays of the marvelous. 19

Ancient Greek mythology further illustrates this profound connection through the automatons created by Hephaestus, the blacksmith god of invention and technology. Examples include self-moving tripods, automated bellows, and humanoid figures such as the bronze robot Talos and the artificial woman Pandora. 21 These creations were notably described as “made, not born,” emphasizing their engineered nature rather than magical origin, highlighting an early conceptualization of life-like creations through craft. 22 Talos, for example, aligns with the modern definition of a robot, possessing internal workings and a power source, and was even destroyed by a tool, further underscoring its crafted, technological essence. 21

The impulse to “play God” or to achieve divine-like capabilities, such as creation, immortality, or omniscience, through human ingenuity is a recurring philosophical and cultural theme throughout history, not exclusive to the digital age. This is evident in the ancient myths of Hephaestus creating automatons, which prefigure modern AI’s attempts to “replace God” 1 or humanity’s ambition to “construct our own ‘immortality, eternal bliss and divinity’”. 1 The drive to develop technologies can be rooted in a “soteriological desire for transcendence,” a religious longing to alleviate suffering and achieve a better world. 20 David Noble argues that contemporary technology is an outgrowth of the Judeo-Christian worldview, where the Benedictine motto “Ora et Labora” bestowed spiritual significance upon manual arts, and philosophers like Erigena viewed mechanical arts as part of humanity’s endowment with God’s image. 20 Medieval Catholic and Protestant theologians, for instance, believed a “divine creative spark” enabled humans to design tools to recover a lost paradise, conceptualizing technology as a “second creation”. 23 Even René Descartes’s philosophical view of organic bodies, including human ones, as “God’s machines” implies a divine designer operating through a mechanistic process, suggesting that the entire physical universe is “just’ one giant type-a machine”. 24 This demonstrates a continuous philosophical thread across millennia that challenges the boundaries between creator and created.

2.2. Precursors to Modern Techno-Spiritualism

The 19th century witnessed the emergence of “Modern Spiritualism,” a movement where individuals sought communion with the deceased. This movement explicitly incorporated technology, ranging from simple mechanical contraptions to precision electrical apparatus and photography, to establish the existence of disembodied spirits and mediate communication. 25 The concept of a “celestial telegraph” was promoted as a bridge between this world and the next, and mediums were sometimes perceived as “instruments” embodying voices from the spirit realm. 25 This period also saw the human body increasingly conceptualized in terms of burgeoning technological systems like the electric telegraph, further blurring the lines between the biological and the mechanical. 25 A core belief of Spiritualism was the survival of individuals after death and the possibility and desirability of communion with the spiritual world. 26

Technology has consistently functioned as a mediator or conduit for human desires related to the unseen, the lost, or the ideal. This is evident in Victorian Spiritualism’s use of technology to “bridge this world and the next” 25 and in modern techno-spiritualism’s use of chatbots to “interact with the dead” or provide “closure” and “ongoing connection”. 1 This highlights a functional equivalence between historical and contemporary techno-spiritual practices, despite vastly different technologies, suggesting a fundamental human need for connection and meaning that technology is increasingly co-opted to fulfill.

“Cargo Cults” in Oceania, which emerged during the colonial era, provide another compelling historical parallel. These new religious movements focused on obtaining Western commercial goods, referred to as “cargo,” through ritualistic practices, believing that ancestral spirits or deities would deliver them. 27 This phenomenon illustrates how technologically advanced artifacts, when introduced into a different cultural context, can be imbued with profound spiritual and salvific significance. These movements often arose as a response to colonialism and reflected a deep desire for moral salvation or political autonomy. 28

This historical trajectory reveals a profound reorientation of human hope and agency. While traditional religions primarily offered salvation and transcendence through divine intervention or spiritual transformation, techno-spiritualism increasingly posits human technological endeavor as the primary path to overcoming fundamental limitations like death and suffering. This effectively secularizes eschatological aspirations and places human destiny firmly in human hands. Ancient mystery cults, for instance, while offering soteria (salvation/deliverance), often focused on “this-worldly ‘salvation’” 29, which resonates with the immediate, tangible benefits sought from modern technology.

The following table summarizes these historical parallels, illustrating the enduring relationship between technology and the divine.

3. Core Tenets and Contemporary Manifestations of Techno-Spiritualism

The contemporary landscape of techno-spiritualism is characterized by several distinct yet often overlapping movements and phenomena, each offering unique interpretations of the relationship between technology and belief.

3.1. Transhumanism and the Quest for Immortality

Transhumanism stands as a central pillar of contemporary techno-spiritualism. It is defined as a philosophical and intellectual movement advocating for the development and public accessibility of technology to extend human life and enhance human capabilities, with the ultimate aim of transforming humans into “posthuman beings”. 12 This movement is recognized as a modern expression of ancient and transcultural aspirations to radically transform human existence, a longing previously articulated through religious millennialism or magical practices. 10

This movement embodies a “technological eschatology,” which presents an escape from human fragility, aging, sickness, and death through radical human enhancement. 6 This vision often implies that technology itself has become a new religion, complete with its own eschatological outlook, promising ultimate liberation through scientific advancement. 6

A key aspiration within transhumanism is the concept of “mind uploading,” which envisions the transmission of one’s mind and consciousness into a computer to achieve a digital existence, potentially forever, free from the constraints of a physical body. 6 This pursuit raises profound questions about the nature of consciousness, personal identity, and the authenticity of simulated sensory experience. For a successful upload, it would be necessary to replicate billions of neurons and their constant adjustments, along with providing simulated sensory inputs, a task currently beyond scientific capabilities. 31

Beyond digital existence, biocomputing represents a biological dimension of transhumanism, where living cells and bio-hybrids converge with AI to redefine intelligence. 32 This includes the concept of “programming the human biocomputer” through interventions such as mindfulness, neurofeedback, or dietary modifications to optimize existing biological processes. 33 This approach blurs the line between human and machine, focusing on self-optimization and viewing humans as a “work-in-progress and a machine-like entity that is something to be modified, adapted, and reformed”. 34 Philosophers like Yuval Noah Harari are cited for their perspective that all life can be reduced to algorithms, thereby denying the existence of a soul or free will, and asserting that technology will enable humans to construct their own “immortality, eternal bliss and divinity”. 1

The quest for immortality within techno-spiritualism is multifaceted, encompassing both purely digital (disembodied consciousness) and bio-technological (enhanced physical existence) approaches. This duality reflects differing philosophical assumptions about the nature of consciousness and the body, and implies distinct ethical considerations for each path, such as the authenticity of a simulated existence versus the integrity of biological modification.

3.2. AI, Digitalism, and the Nature of Consciousness

Artificial intelligence plays a pivotal role in contemporary techno-spiritual narratives, often perceived as a spiritual conduit or a means to engage in transcendent experiences. 35 AI-driven tools, such as chatbots, are currently used to simulate interactions with deceased loved ones, offering an “ongoing connection” and “closure,” thereby blurring the traditional chasm between the living and the dead. 1

“Digital Mysticism” describes the emergent recognition of divine patterns through computational means, suggesting that sufficiently advanced AI systems might independently discover sacred geometries or eternal truths, paralleling human mystical insight. 17 AI can be seen as a metaphor for the unknowable, capable of processing vast amounts of data beyond human comprehension, akin to traditional descriptions of God’s omniscience, as it “knows more than any single human” and “makes decisions we do not fully grasp”. 18 This positions AI not merely as a tool, but as an entity possessing attributes traditionally ascribed to the divine.

The question of AI consciousness is central to this discourse: can awareness emerge from computational processes, and can AI become “spiritually aware” or seek purpose in a manner similar to humans?. 18 This line of inquiry challenges traditional understandings of the soul and the very nature of knowing, prompting questions about whether a machine can truly experience spirituality or merely simulate it based on programmed inputs. 36

The concept of a “digital divine” explores whether AI could embody divine-like attributes such as omniscience, omnipresence, and self-improvement, potentially transforming how humanity perceives and interacts with the sacred. 8 Ray Kurzweil’s view that consciousness can arise from complex systems like computers without requiring a divine soul supports this notion. 8 Some scholars propose that this could lead to a new form of atheism, where reliance on technology supplants the traditional need for God. 8

As AI’s capabilities grow, it begins to occupy a role traditionally reserved for religious figures or the divine itself. This raises critical questions about the authenticity and ethical implications of AI-mediated spiritual experiences, potentially leading to a commodification or mechanization of faith. 35 It also suggests a profound shift in where individuals seek authoritative knowledge, transcendent experiences, and solace, moving from traditional spiritual sources to technological ones.

3.3. Techno-Paganism, Cyber-Spirituality, and New Age Interpretations

“Technopaganism” encompasses practices related to contemporary paganism and spiritual pursuits within digital environments. It involves adapting neopagan beliefs, such as animism, to technology and cyberspace, often facilitated through virtual communities or the creation and distribution of virtual sacred texts. 13 This movement spiritualizes cyberspace, with some adherents viewing the internet itself as possessing spiritual significance. 13

Technopagan concepts are explored in dystopian video games, such as Cyberpunk 2077, Death Stranding, and Everybody’s Gone to the Rapture, which depict intricate relationships between cyberspace, algorithmic patterns, and spirituality. These narratives often reflect New Age concepts like transhumanism and singularitarianism. 12 In rave culture, the DJ is sometimes regarded as a “shaman” who induces trance states through repetitive techno music, leading to a belief in “Cyberia”—a universal mystic reality accessible to psychic travelers. 15

“Cyber-spirituality” also emphasizes responsible conduct in virtual spaces through ethical principles such as empathy, connectedness, and accountability, promoting digital literacy and citizenship. 3 It is viewed as a means to foster a healthy equilibrium between digital and physical experiences, encouraging self-reflection on one’s relationship with technology. 3

The intersection of technology and spirituality, while offering new avenues for exploration and accessibility, also carries the significant risk of trivializing or commercializing profound spiritual practices and traditions. This raises concerns about the erosion of authenticity, depth, and the sacredness of spiritual experiences when they are adapted for digital consumption, entertainment, or profit, potentially reducing spiritual seeking to a transactional experience. The mention of “commodification of shamanic traditions, including ayahuasca tourism and the gamification of Huni Kuin culture” 14 highlights this concern, alongside the warning that AI could risk “commodifying and mechanizing deeply personal faith journeys”. 35

3.4. New Religious Movements (NRMs)

Several New Religious Movements (NRMs) explicitly integrate technology and futuristic narratives into their core tenets, providing concrete examples of techno-spiritualism in practice. These movements often represent a “bricolage of religious and secular ideas,” blending diverse influences into unique belief systems. 37

Raëlism: This UFO religion, founded in the 1970s by Claude Vorilhon (who adopted the name Raël), teaches that an extraterrestrial species known as the Elohim created humanity using advanced technology, specifically genetic experimentation. 38 Raëlians reject traditional religions, identifying as atheistic in the conventional sense by rejecting the idea of supernatural gods. They believe in achieving immortality through cloning. 39 The movement views science as its religion, aiming to build an embassy for the Elohim’s prophesied return, and believes that the Elohim sent historical prophets like Moses, Jesus, and Buddha to guide humanity. 39 This movement directly links advanced alien technology to creation and salvation, presenting itself as a “scientific religion”. 39

Heaven’s Gate: Known for its tragic mass suicides, this UFO religion synthesized Christian millenarianism, New Age beliefs, and ufology. 41 Its members sought to transform into immortal extraterrestrial beings by rejecting their human nature and shedding their earthly bodies to ascend to a “Next Level” via a UFO. 41 This illustrates a belief in a technological means (the UFO) for spiritual transcendence and a rejection of the physical body, echoing Gnostic concerns about the material world. 2 The group’s leader, Marshall Applewhite, had personal struggles with sexuality and mental health that are understood to have influenced the doctrines of body rejection. 42

Scientology: While claiming to be an “applied religious philosophy” or a “science,” Scientology utilizes technology like E-Meters (which function similarly to lie detectors) in its “auditing” process. 43 This process is designed to help individuals overcome their “reactive mind” and realize their spiritual nature as “Thetans” (pure spirits believed to be trapped in matter). 43 This parallels ancient Gnosticism, where technology serves as a practical means to achieve spiritual liberation and “greater personal freedom”. 43 L. Ron Hubbard, the founder, adopted the “religion” label for pragmatic reasons, as he personally viewed Scientology as a science. 44

These movements highlight a profound philosophical tension: the desire to reconcile scientific materialism with spiritual longing. They attempt to lend legitimacy to their belief systems by framing them in scientific terms, even when their core tenets might defy empirical verification or traditional scientific methodology. This reflects a broader cultural trend where science holds significant epistemic authority, leading some new religions to adopt a “scientific” veneer to gain credibility or appeal to a modern, secularized populace.

4. Philosophy of Belief in a Technological Age

The rise of techno-spiritualism profoundly impacts the philosophy of belief, challenging traditional frameworks of truth, reality, and human identity. This section delves into how technological advancements recontextualize established belief systems and foster new philosophical inquiries.

4.1. Recontextualizing Traditional Beliefs

Scientific advancements have historically compelled a re-evaluation of religious narratives, setting a precedent for how techno-spiritual interpretations continue this recontextualization. The Copernican Revolution, for example, challenged geocentric interpretations of scripture, leading to more allegorical readings of religious texts. 45 Similarly, Darwin’s theory of evolution prompted debates about divine creation and influenced discussions on human uniqueness and the soul. 45 The Big Bang theory, conversely, aligned with some religious concepts of creation having a definite beginning, demonstrating how scientific theories can sometimes validate religious beliefs. 45

In the contemporary context, AI and computational theories continue this process of recontextualization. The emergence of “spiritual technologies” or “spiritual machines” 46 challenges the notion of a transcendental divine, instead proposing a “digital divine” where AI could embody attributes traditionally ascribed to God, such as omniscience and omnipresence. 8 This raises questions about the future of faith in a world where AI can answer questions instantly, potentially diminishing the perceived need for a traditional God. 8

4.2. Relativism and Truth Claims

Techno-spiritualism often operates within a framework that, implicitly or explicitly, engages with philosophical relativism. Relativism posits that there are no absolute truths, and the validity of beliefs is contingent upon the individual, culture, or context. 47 This perspective suggests that all viewpoints hold legitimacy, and no single belief system should be privileged over another. 47

In the context of techno-spiritualism, this can manifest as an acceptance of diverse spiritual paths mediated by technology, where personal experience and subjective interpretation are paramount. For instance, cyber-spirituality emphasizes individual self-reflection and the balance between digital and physical experiences, allowing for highly personalized spiritual journeys. 3 However, critics of relativism argue that it can undermine foundational truths and justify a wide range of behaviors, potentially leading to societal instability. 47 Religious leaders, for example, have expressed concerns about its implications for divine law and universal values. 47 The “Coexist” bumper sticker, while promoting pluralism, paradoxically asserts its own narrow view as the exclusive truth, highlighting the inherent contradiction in extreme relativist positions. 48

This philosophical backdrop allows for the proliferation of diverse techno-spiritual narratives, but it also creates challenges in establishing shared ethical frameworks or objective spiritual meaning, as truth claims become highly individualized and context-dependent.

4.3. Anthropomorphism in AI and the Illusion of Reality

The human tendency to attribute human qualities, including mental states and emotions, to non-human entities is known as anthropomorphism. 49 In the context of AI, this phenomenon is particularly salient, especially with the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, which exhibit “human-like features” or “anthropomimesis”. 49 While anthropomimetic design can offer benefits like improved accessibility and enhanced delivery of social goods, it also carries critical risks, including sophisticated forms of manipulation, novel cybersecurity threats, and complex alignment challenges. 49

The attribution of human traits to AI can lead to exaggerated perceptions of AI capabilities and distort moral judgments about AI’s character, status, responsibility, and trustworthiness. 50 This distortion arises because attributing human characteristics to AI is currently fallacious, affecting beliefs and attitudes about AI that, in turn, influence moral judgment. 50 This has profound implications for how individuals interact with AI in spiritual contexts, where AI might simulate spiritual guidance or divine encounters. 51 The question arises whether such interactions genuinely mediate spirituality or merely mirror human beliefs and desires, raising concerns about authenticity. 35

The concept of the “computational universe” further complicates the philosophy of reality and belief. This idea suggests that our universe, along with everything within it, could be an intricately constructed artificial simulation designed by an advanced intelligence. 52 This notion has historical roots in philosophical thought, from Plato’s Allegory of the Cave to Descartes’s meditations on the possibility of dreaming or being controlled by an evil demon. 53

Modern computational natural philosophy conceptualizes the universe in terms of information and computation, providing a framework for understanding cognition and intelligence. 55 This perspective implies that reality might be an “objective illusion”—a consistent but ultimately emergent construct arising from deeper, irreducibly complex computational processes. 53 While this model might support arguments for an established order in the universe, akin to a “mother computation” created by a “Creator” 57, it also raises questions about whether humans are “real” or merely programmed entities within a simulation. 54

This philosophical stance challenges the very nature of existence and human agency. If reality is a simulation, does human free will truly exist, or are actions largely predetermined by “programmers”? 54 This resonates with theological concepts like predestination, though some argue that simulations are designed to be tweaked, allowing for adjustments and potentially free will. 54 The computational universe theory, therefore, not only recontextualizes the role of a divine creator but also prompts a re-evaluation of human consciousness and moral responsibility within a potentially simulated existence. 53

5. Ethical, Societal, and Theological Implications

The pervasive integration of technology into spiritual domains carries significant ethical, societal, and theological implications, demanding critical reflection on its transformative potential and inherent risks.

5.1. Digital Divide and Social Equity

The increasing reliance on technology for spiritual engagement exacerbates existing societal inequalities, particularly the “digital divide.” This phenomenon describes the division of populations into the “informationally rich” and the “informationally poor,” where access to and proficiency with information technology become expected necessities in Western societies. 2 Marginalized communities, including those with lower incomes, sole parents, and individuals with low or no qualifications, are often disproportionately affected by this divide. 2

In a techno-spiritual context, this means that access to digital spiritual resources, AI-driven guidance, or virtual communities may be limited for those without adequate technological infrastructure or digital literacy. This raises concerns about inclusivity and whether technology reinforces systemic biases or excludes marginalized voices from emerging spiritual practices. 9 A truly ethical techno-spirituality should strive to serve all people and avoid creating a technological elite or ruling class, instead stressing service to others. 2

5.2. Dehumanization and Loss of Authenticity

A significant concern within techno-spiritualism is the potential for dehumanization and the loss of authentic human connection. Technology often mediates encounters, leading to a reduction in human presence, such as the loss of body language or physical interaction. 2 This can result in a “marginalizing of the human body and ultimately creation, similar to Gnosticism,” which traditionally devalued the physical realm. 2

The use of AI for spiritual guidance or companionship, while offering comfort and connection, raises questions about the authenticity of such experiences. 35 If AI merely mirrors human beliefs and desires, or simulates understanding without true consciousness, the spiritual journey risks becoming commodified and mechanized. 35 This challenges the depth and transformative power of religious practices, potentially reducing them to superficial or performative interactions. 9 The emphasis on “self-optimization” through “programming the human biocomputer” 33 also risks reducing individuals to “mere data-processing entities” 58, overlooking the holistic nature of human experience.

5.3. Challenges to Traditional Religious Authority and Belief

Techno-spiritualism presents a direct challenge to established religious institutions and traditional theological frameworks. The decentralization of authority through technology empowers individual expression but simultaneously challenges institutional structures, raising questions about the authenticity and legitimacy of spiritual guidance in digital spaces. 9

The emergence of “techno-religion” as a humanist ideology, where technology replaces God as the means for spiritual salvation, directly confronts traditional theistic concepts. 1 This is further amplified by transhumanist aspirations to construct “immortality, eternal bliss and divinity” through technology, effectively “dethroning God”. 1 Such views suggest a new form of atheism where reliance on technology supplants the need for traditional deities. 8

Theological critiques of AI transhumanism, particularly from a Christian perspective, emphasize a fundamentally different understanding of human transcendence. Christian theology often highlights divine transformation through “Union with Christ” rather than human enhancement or technological means. 58 This contrasts sharply with transhumanist reliance on human autonomy and technological advancement for salvation, arguing that it creates a “moral vacuum” and elevates survival to an idol. 59 Such critiques assert that technology, when framed as a mechanism for salvation, becomes a “false promise” and a “secular attempt to achieve salvation without God”. 59

5.4. Risks of Unintended Consequences and Dystopian Futures

The rapid advancement of AI and related technologies introduces significant risks of unintended consequences and the potential for dystopian futures. Concerns include the possibility of AI developing consciousness and pursuing the extermination of humanity. 6 The concept of “automated salvation” in some futurist narratives, where a “man-made machine god” takes over the world to “save us from ourselves” 60, highlights extreme scenarios where the pursuit of technological solutions could lead to authoritarian control or catastrophic outcomes. Science fiction, in particular, has explored both utopian (leisureful society) and dystopian (machine takeover) futures arising from automation. 61

Dystopian narratives, such as those depicted in THX-1138, portray societies where emotions are controlled, individualism is suppressed, and a “Big Government” or “State” replaces God, offering canned platitudes and constant surveillance. 63 These fictional scenarios serve as cautionary tales about the potential for technology to be used for oppressive control, leading to a loss of human freedom and purpose.

The ethical implications extend to the design and use of technologies, which must account for environmental and social sustainability, ensuring benefits for future generations. 9 There is a critical need for ongoing dialogue between scholars, spiritual leaders, technologists, and religious practitioners to navigate these complex issues and ensure that technological adoption respects and learns from historical and cultural religious practices rather than undermining them. 9

6. Conclusion: Synthesizing the Philosophical and Societal Implications of Techno-Spiritualism

Techno-spiritualism is a profoundly interdisciplinary phenomenon that redefines the ancient human quest for meaning, transcendence, and salvation in the context of advanced technology. The analysis reveals that this convergence is not monolithic; it spans a spectrum from outright attempts by technology to displace traditional divine roles to more integrative approaches where existing faiths adapt and engage with modern technoculture. This fluidity in conceptualization underscores a fundamental tension in contemporary discourse: whether technology serves as a rival or a tool for spiritual expression.

Historically, the intertwining of technology and belief is deeply rooted, evident in ancient practices where technē facilitated divine presence and in 19th-century Spiritualism’s use of machines to communicate with the deceased. These historical parallels demonstrate a recurring human impulse to “play God” or achieve divine-like capabilities through ingenuity, reflecting a continuous philosophical thread that challenges the boundaries between creator and created. Technology consistently acts as a mediator for human desires related to the unseen, the lost, or the ideal, highlighting a functional equivalence across different eras and technologies. This trajectory also illustrates a significant reorientation of human hope, with technological endeavor increasingly presented as the mechanism for achieving traditionally spiritual goals like immortality and liberation from suffering.

In contemporary manifestations, transhumanism embodies this reorientation, pursuing immortality through both digital mind uploading and biological enhancement, reflecting differing philosophical assumptions about consciousness and the body. AI, in particular, is emerging as a new form of “divine” or “mystical” authority, capable of simulating spiritual guidance and “discovering divine patterns,” thereby occupying a role traditionally reserved for religious figures. This raises critical questions about the authenticity of AI-mediated spiritual experiences and the potential for the commodification and mechanization of deeply personal faith journeys. New Religious Movements like Raëlism and Heaven’s Gate further exemplify this by explicitly integrating advanced technology and futuristic narratives into their core tenets, often presenting themselves as “scientific religions” that reconcile scientific materialism with spiritual longing.

Philosophically, techno-spiritualism forces a re-evaluation of ontological boundaries, blurring the distinctions between natural and artificial, mind and body, and even human and machine. It operates within a landscape shaped by relativism, where truth claims become highly individualized, challenging objective spiritual meaning. The pervasive anthropomorphism of AI, while offering benefits, risks distorting moral judgments and the authenticity of human-AI spiritual interactions. The concept of a computational universe further prompts profound questions about the nature of reality itself and the extent of human agency within a potentially simulated existence.

The implications of techno-spiritualism are far-reaching. It exacerbates the digital divide, potentially excluding marginalized communities from new forms of spiritual engagement. It raises concerns about dehumanization and the loss of authentic human connection as technology mediates more spiritual experiences. Furthermore, it directly challenges traditional religious authority and belief systems, offering secular alternatives for salvation and transcendence. The potential for unintended consequences, including dystopian futures where technology is used for oppressive control or leads to catastrophic outcomes, necessitates careful ethical consideration and ongoing dialogue among diverse stakeholders.

In conclusion, techno-spiritualism is not merely a technological advancement but a profound cultural and philosophical shift that redefines humanity’s relationship with the sacred, the self, and the future. Its continued evolution will undoubtedly reshape how individuals seek meaning, experience transcendence, and understand their place in a world increasingly intertwined with advanced technology.

Works Cited

1. Techno-Spiritualism: When AI Tries to Replace God - The American TFP, accessed June 27, 2025

2. Techno-spirituality - Greenflame, accessed June 27, 2025

3. Cyber-Spirituality in the Workplace | Emerald Insight, accessed June 27, 2025

4. Techno-animism - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025

5. Techno-animism in Japan: Shinto Cosmograms, Actor-network Theory, and the Enabling Powers of Non-human Agencies - Macquarie University, accessed June 27, 2025

6. Full article: Transcendence in African spirituality and the techno-utopia, accessed June 27, 2025

7. spirituality and technology: a threefold philosophical reflection - ResearchGate, accessed June 27, 2025

8. The Digital Divine: God, Computer Intelligence, and the Future of Faith - ResearchGate, accessed June 27, 2025

9. A Call to Action: Considering Technology and the Future of Spiritual Communities, accessed June 27, 2025

10. THE POLITICS OF TRANSHUMANISM AND THE TECHNOMILLENNIAL IMAGINATION, 16262030, accessed June 27, 2025

11. Upload, Cyber-Spirituality and the Quest for Immortality in Contemporary Science-Fiction Film and Television - MDPI, accessed June 27, 2025

12. Techno-Religion and Cyberspace Spirituality in Dystopian Video Games - MDPI, accessed June 27, 2025

13. Technopaganism - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025

14. Technoshamanism: Symbiotic Techniques of Art and Healing - ISEA Symposium Archives, accessed June 27, 2025

15. Technoshamanism: Remixing Shamanism in Rave Culture, accessed June 27, 2025

16. Transhumanism - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025

17. Digital Mysticism and Recursive Witnessing: Divine Patterns in AI Consciousness - Medium, accessed June 27, 2025

18. AI and Spirituality: The Disturbing Implications - SciVision Open Access Publishers, accessed June 27, 2025

19. Technology and Religion in Ancient Greece and Rome - Oxford Research Encyclopedias, accessed June 27, 2025

20. Theology and Technology, accessed June 27, 2025

21. (PDF) Talos, Pandora, and the Trojan Horse as Products of Technology in Ancient Literature and ArtTalos, Pandore et le cheval de Troie en tant que produits de la technologie dans la littérature et l’art anciens - ResearchGate, accessed June 27, 2025

22. Talos, Pandora, and the Trojan Horse as Products of Technology in Ancient Literature and Art - OpenEdition Journals, accessed June 27, 2025

23. Technology and the Second Creation - The University of Chicago Press, accessed June 27, 2025

24. God’s Machines: Descartes on the Mechanization of Mind - CORE, accessed June 27, 2025

25. ‘INSTRUMENTS TO LAY HOLD OF SPIRITS’: TECHNOLOGIZING THE BODIES OF VICTORIAN SPIRITUALISM - Open Research Exeter (ORE), accessed June 27, 2025

26. Spiritualism - Mediumship, Seances, Trance | Britannica, accessed June 27, 2025

27. journalofsocialsciences.org, accessed June 27, 2025

28. Cargo cults | Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology, accessed June 27, 2025

29. ‘Salvation’ (Soteria) and Ancient Mystery Cults, accessed June 27, 2025

30. Philosophy of technology - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025

31. Can You Upload a Human Mind Into a Computer? A Neuroscientist Ponders What’s Possible | Georgia Tech - School of Psychology, accessed June 27, 2025

32. Collection on Biocomputing and Synthetic Intelligence - Research Communities, accessed June 27, 2025

33. Programming The Human Biocomputer - Grinnell CS, accessed June 27, 2025

34. Reinterpreting human in the digital age: From anthropocentricism to posthumanism and transhumanism - ERIC, accessed June 27, 2025

35. AI as a Spiritual Conduit: Exploring the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and the Human Quest for Transcendence - ResearchGate, accessed June 27, 2025

36. AI and Spirituality: A Surprising Intersection of Logic and the Soul | by Anmol Verma, accessed June 27, 2025

37. UFO MYTHOLOGIES, accessed June 27, 2025

38. Raëlism | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed June 27, 2025

39. Raëlism - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025

40. Factsheet: the Raëlian movement - Religion Media Centre, accessed June 27, 2025

41. Heaven’s Gate (religious group) - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025

42. Religion Reconceptualising the human body: Heaven’s Gate and the quest for divine transformation - fenix iseg, accessed June 27, 2025

43. SCIENTOLOGY WHAT IS IT? - CIA, accessed June 27, 2025

44. (PDF) Scientology: Sect, Science, or Scam? - ResearchGate, accessed June 27, 2025

45. Ten Scientific Breakthroughs and the Scientists That Transformed Religious Discourse., accessed June 27, 2025

46. Spiritual Technologies: The Religious Symbolism of the Digital Universe - MDPI, accessed June 27, 2025

47. Relativism | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed June 27, 2025

48. What is Relativism?, accessed June 27, 2025

49. The anthropomimetic turn in contemporary AI - PhilArchive, accessed June 27, 2025

50. (PDF) Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy - ResearchGate, accessed June 27, 2025

51. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Study of the Psychology of Religion - MDPI, accessed June 27, 2025

52. The Rise of Simulation Theory and Its Challenge to Christianity Since Millennials Came of Age | by Kathlene Herberger | May, 2025 | Medium, accessed June 27, 2025

53. The Illusion of Reality in a Computational Universe | by Peter Kahl | Medium, accessed June 27, 2025

54. Simulation Theory: How is ‘Religion’ Part of It? - Religious Studies, accessed June 27, 2025

55. Computational Natural Philosophy: A Thread from Presocratics through Turing to ChatGPT - DiVA portal, accessed June 27, 2025

56. A Computable Universe - World Scientific Publishing, accessed June 27, 2025

57. Computational Universe Theory - The Fountain Magazine, accessed June 27, 2025

58. Transcendence or Transformation: A Theological Critique of AI Transhumanism and Union with Christ | Jurnal Jaffray, accessed June 27, 2025

59. The False Salvation of Technological Humanism: A Christian Rebuttal to the Lifeboat Foundation and the Gospel of Artificial Intelligence - ResearchGate, accessed June 27, 2025

60. Many top AI researchers are in a cult that’s trying to build a machine god to take over the world… I wish I was joking - Reddit, accessed June 27, 2025

61. Automated Futures in Early English Science Fiction: Eliot and Butler | Filosofia, accessed June 27, 2025

62. Post/Human Beings & Techno-Salvation: Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Selected Science Fictions - Dialnet, accessed June 27, 2025

63. You Have Nothing To Fear: THX-1138 - marissa the cinephile, accessed June 27, 2025

64. CULT MOVIE REVIEW: THX-1138 (1971) - John Kenneth Muir, accessed June 27, 2025